Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.56 seconds)
Documents citing Jai Prakash vs Union Of India & Anr. on 1 February, 2012

Kulwanti vs Uoi & Others on 14 July, 2014

14. The Reference Court as well as Hon'ble High Court of Delhi have already considered the evidence and material in case of Jai Prakash (supra) regarding fixation of market value. No evidence showing that the land of petitioner is better than the land involved in the case of 'Jai Prakash' has been brought on record by the petitioner. Similarly, no evidence showing that the land of petitioner is inferior in any aspect than the land referred to in case of Jai Prakash has been adduced by the respondents.
Delhi District Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. Mahender Singh vs Union Of India on 17 July, 2014

14. The Reference Court as well as Hon'ble High Court of Delhi have already considered the evidence and material in case of Jai Prakash (supra) regarding fixation of market value. No evidence showing that the land of petitioner is better than the land involved in the case of 'Jai Prakash' has been brought on record by the petitioner. Similarly, no evidence showing that the land of petitioner is inferior in any aspect than the land referred to in case of Jai Prakash has been adduced by the respondents.
Delhi District Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shri Ranjeet Singh vs Union Of India on 5 March, 2012

13. ISSUE NO. 2: As noticed herein above, the petitioner has relied upon the judgment delivered in the case of Jai LAC No. 34/10 Page No. 5/10 DOD 5.03.2012 Prakash ( Supra). No evidence showing that the land of petitioner is better than the land involved in the case of Jai Prakash has been brought on record by the petitioner. Similarly no evidence showing that the land of petitioner is inferior in any aspect than the land referred to in case of Jai Prakash has been adduced by the respondents. Therefore, in the present reference market value of land in question shall be the same as was determined by Ld. Predecessor and as has been upheld by Hon'ble High Court for Block 'A' land as the land of petitioner in reference under Section 18 of LA Act has been reflected as " category A land".
Delhi District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kanwal Singh vs . Uoi on 24 April, 2012

All the evidence which is brought on record in this case is already considered in the case of Jai Prakash (Supra) and there is no new evidence to persuade the Court to take a different view in this reference. No evidence showing that the land of petitioner is better than the land involved in the case of Jai Prakash has been brought on record by the petitioner. Similarly no evidence showing that the land of petitioner is inferior in any aspect than the land referred to in case of Jai Prakash has been adduced by the respondents. Therefore, in the present reference market value of land in question shall be the same as was determined by Ld. Predecessor and as has been upheld by Hon'ble High Court for Block 'A' land as the land of petitioner in reference under Section 18 of LA Act has been reflected as Category A land.
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Union Of India vs Anand & Ors. on 10 December, 2014

Impugned judgment assessed compensation of land in village Bamnoli which was acquired in pursuance to Notification of 4 th November, 2004 under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act. The Reference Court has relied upon the decision of this Court in LA.APP.No. 115/2011 Jai Prakash vs. Union of India & Anr. decided on 1st February, 2012 to determine the compensation in these appeals.
Delhi High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 1 - S Gaur - Full Document
1