Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (1.35 seconds)
Documents citing Kunisetti Gangi Reddy vs Kukkuteswara Swamy Temple Rep. By Its ... on 18 August, 1992

C V Reddy, Chittoor Dist vs E Eswar Reddy, Chittoor Dist 1 Other on 24 February, 2022

10. POINT: At the outset, learned counsel for the revision petitioner placed reliance on a decision of this Court in the case of Kunisetti Gangi Reddy v. Kukkuteswara Swamy Temple rep. by its Executive Officer and others1 in support of his contention that in a suit for mere injunction, a third party cannot be allowed to be impleaded as a defendant, since any decree, if passed in the suit, does not bind the third party. It is pertinent to refer to the facts of the decision, which are as follows:
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Vasavi Kanyaka Seva Trust, Ramanthapur vs District Collector, R.R. Dist., Hyd. ... on 6 March, 2000

In the decision in K. Gangi Reddy's case (supra) relied upon by the petitioner it was held that in a suit for mere injunction, any decree passed would not bind a third party and if it is of the view that the present suit would affect its interest, they are free to file a suit seeking appropriately and it is not a matter wherein it should be allowed to come on record as a defendant in the suit for injunction.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 9 - Cited by 3 - Full Document
1