Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.50 seconds)

Maa Saraswati Traders vs The Union Of India & Ors on 28 February, 2012

19. From the aforesaid well settled principles of law, it is quite apparent that so far the point of time at which reasonable belief should exist is concerned, whenever the goods are seized, the officer seizing the goods must at the time of seizure have a reasonable belief that the goods he was seizing were smuggled goods and any subsequent acquisition of knowledge of such belief would be of no avail. So far the allegation that betel nuts in question were of foreign origin is concerned, a Division Bench of this court in case of Commissioner, Custom Department, Government of India, Patna v. Dwarika Prasad Agarwal & Ors., reported in 2009(2) PLJR 858 had specifically held that it was not in dispute that betel nut was non-notified item and, as such, the onus to prove that the same was of foreign origin lay on Custom authority.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 21 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Sri Sai Trading Company & Anr vs The Union Of India & Ors on 14 November, 2011

15. From the aforesaid well settled principles of law, it is quite apparent that so far the point of time at which reasonable belief should exist is concerned, whenever the goods are seized, the officer seizing the goods must at the time of seizure have a reasonable belief that the goods he was seizing were smuggled goods and any subsequent acquisition of knowledge of such belief would be of no avail. So far the allegation that betel nuts in question were of foreign origin is concerned, a Division Bench of this court in case of Commissioner, Custom Department, Government of India, Patna (supra) had specifically held that it was not in dispute that betel nut was non-notified item and, as such, the onus to prove that the same was of foreign origin lay on Custom authority.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 7 - Cited by 9 - Full Document
1