Reserved On: 14.11.2025 vs Of on 10 December, 2025
In Dolat Ram v. State of Haryana (1995) 1 SCC 349, this
Court delineated broad, though not exhaustive, grounds
justifying cancellation of bail, including:
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 989 (3.00 seconds)Documents citing
Dolat Ram vs State Of Haryana on 24 November, 1994
Reserved On: 13.5.2026 vs Of on 20 May, 2026
In Dolat Ram v. State of Haryana (1995) 1 SCC
349, this Court delineated broad, though not
exhaustive, grounds justifying cancellation of bail,
including:
The State Of Tripura vs Khairul Islam on 15 September, 2025
Judge Bench of this Court in Dolat Ram And
Others Vs. State of Haryana : (1995) 1 SCC
349 laid down the grounds for cancellation of
bail which are :-
Kanta Devi vs State Of H.P. And Another on 10 December, 2025
In Dolat Ram v. State of Haryana (1995) 1 SCC 349, this
Court delineated broad, though not exhaustive, grounds
justifying cancellation of bail, including:
Unknown vs Manjeet Singh And Another on 13 March, 2026
This proposition
draws support from the judgment of this Court
in Dolat Ram v. State of Haryana [(1995) 1 SCC
349: 1995 SCC (Cri) 237], Kashmira Singh v.
Duman Singh [(1996) 4 SCC 693: 1996 SCC (Cri)
844] and X v. State of Telangana [(2018) 16 SCC
511 : (2020) 1 SCC (Cri) 902].'
The State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Rashid Khan @ Arif Khan on 29 August, 2024
12. As held in Dolat Ram and Others v. State of Haryana [(1995) 1 SCC
349] very cogent and overwhelming circumstances are necessary to
cancel the bail already granted and that bail once granted should not be
cancelled in a mechanical manner without considering whether the
supervening circumstances have rendered it no longer conducive to a
fair trial to allow the accused to retain his freedom by enjoying the
concession of bail during the trial.
Reserved On: 01.04.2025 vs State Of Himachal Pradesh & Ors on 22 April, 2025
In Bhagwan Singh v. Dilip Kumar @ Deepu @ Depak, 2023
INSC 761, this Court, in view of Dolat Ram v. State of
Haryana, (1995) 1 SCC 349; Kashmira Singh v. Duman
Singh, (1996) 4 SCC 693 and X v. State of Telangana, (2018)
16 SCC 511, held as follows:
The State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Anil Saket on 29 August, 2024
12. As held in Dolat Ram and Others v. State of Haryana [(1995) 1 SCC
349] very cogent and overwhelming circumstances are necessary to
cancel the bail already granted and that bail once granted should not be
cancelled in a mechanical manner without considering whether the
supervening circumstances have rendered it no longer conducive to a
fair trial to allow the accused to retain his freedom by enjoying the
concession of bail during the trial.
Daniel Chenaux vs State Of Himachal Pradesh And Anr on 20 March, 2025
In Bhagwan Singh v. Dilip Kumar @ Deepu @
Depak, 2023 INSC 761, this Court, in view of Dolat
Ram v. State of Haryana, (1995) 1 SCC 349; Kashmira
Singh v. Duman Singh, (1996) 4 SCC 693 and X v. State of
Telangana, (2018) 16 SCC 511, held as follows:
Daniel Chenaux vs State Of Himachal Pradesh And Anr on 20 March, 2025
In Bhagwan Singh v. Dilip Kumar @ Deepu @
Depak, 2023 INSC 761, this Court, in view of Dolat
Ram v. State of Haryana, (1995) 1 SCC 349; Kashmira
Singh v. Duman Singh, (1996) 4 SCC 693 and X v. State of
Telangana, (2018) 16 SCC 511, held as follows: