Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (2.07 seconds)
Documents citing Musafir Hajam @ Musafir Thakur vs State Of Bihar on 26 March, 2015

Ash Narayan Sah & Ors vs State Of Bihar on 17 October, 2017

(i) In the present case (Cr. Appeal (DB) no.559 of 1993) there are altogether six injured witnesses namely P.W.24 Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.559 of 1993 dt.17-10-2017 19/82 Jarifan Khatoon, P.W.25 Julekha, P.W.26 Mazidan Mian, P.W.27 Saiful Khatoon, P.W.28 Md. Hanif and P.w.29 Ibrana Khatoon. Out of them P.Ws. 24, 25, 26, 28 and 29 have not named any of the appellant and P.W.27 Saiful Khatoon has named only one accused i.e. Laxmi Dhobi whereas this P.W.27 Saiful Khatoon was examined as P.W.21 in Cr. Appeal (DB) No.347of 1997 (Musafir Hazam @ Musafir Thakur vs. State). He has not named any of the accused and was tendered.
Patna High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - A K Upadhyay - Full Document

Ram Briksh Sah And Ors vs State Of Bihar on 17 October, 2017

(i) In the present case (Cr. Appeal (DB) no.559 of 1993) there are altogether six injured witnesses namely P.W.24 Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.559 of 1993 dt.17-10-2017 19/82 Jarifan Khatoon, P.W.25 Julekha, P.W.26 Mazidan Mian, P.W.27 Saiful Khatoon, P.W.28 Md. Hanif and P.w.29 Ibrana Khatoon. Out of them P.Ws. 24, 25, 26, 28 and 29 have not named any of the appellant and P.W.27 Saiful Khatoon has named only one accused i.e. Laxmi Dhobi whereas this P.W.27 Saiful Khatoon was examined as P.W.21 in Cr. Appeal (DB) No.347of 1997 (Musafir Hazam @ Musafir Thakur vs. State). He has not named any of the accused and was tendered.
Patna High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - A K Upadhyay - Full Document

Lakshmi Dhobi vs State Of Bihar on 17 October, 2017

(i) In the present case (Cr. Appeal (DB) no.559 of 1993) there are altogether six injured witnesses namely P.W.24 Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.559 of 1993 dt.17-10-2017 19/82 Jarifan Khatoon, P.W.25 Julekha, P.W.26 Mazidan Mian, P.W.27 Saiful Khatoon, P.W.28 Md. Hanif and P.w.29 Ibrana Khatoon. Out of them P.Ws. 24, 25, 26, 28 and 29 have not named any of the appellant and P.W.27 Saiful Khatoon has named only one accused i.e. Laxmi Dhobi whereas this P.W.27 Saiful Khatoon was examined as P.W.21 in Cr. Appeal (DB) No.347of 1997 (Musafir Hazam @ Musafir Thakur vs. State). He has not named any of the accused and was tendered.
Patna High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - A K Upadhyay - Full Document

Musafir Hajam @ Musafir Thakur vs State Of Bihar on 17 October, 2017

(i) In the present case (Cr. Appeal (DB) no.559 of 1993) there are altogether six injured witnesses namely P.W.24 Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.559 of 1993 dt.17-10-2017 19/82 Jarifan Khatoon, P.W.25 Julekha, P.W.26 Mazidan Mian, P.W.27 Saiful Khatoon, P.W.28 Md. Hanif and P.w.29 Ibrana Khatoon. Out of them P.Ws. 24, 25, 26, 28 and 29 have not named any of the appellant and P.W.27 Saiful Khatoon has named only one accused i.e. Laxmi Dhobi whereas this P.W.27 Saiful Khatoon was examined as P.W.21 in Cr. Appeal (DB) No.347of 1997 (Musafir Hazam @ Musafir Thakur vs. State). He has not named any of the accused and was tendered.
Patna High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - A K Upadhyay - Full Document

Dashrath Sah @ Dashrath Choudhary & Anr vs State Of Bihar on 17 October, 2017

(i) In the present case (Cr. Appeal (DB) no.559 of 1993) there are altogether six injured witnesses namely P.W.24 Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.559 of 1993 dt.17-10-2017 19/82 Jarifan Khatoon, P.W.25 Julekha, P.W.26 Mazidan Mian, P.W.27 Saiful Khatoon, P.W.28 Md. Hanif and P.w.29 Ibrana Khatoon. Out of them P.Ws. 24, 25, 26, 28 and 29 have not named any of the appellant and P.W.27 Saiful Khatoon has named only one accused i.e. Laxmi Dhobi whereas this P.W.27 Saiful Khatoon was examined as P.W.21 in Cr. Appeal (DB) No.347of 1997 (Musafir Hazam @ Musafir Thakur vs. State). He has not named any of the accused and was tendered.
Patna High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - A K Upadhyay - Full Document
1