Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 59 (0.71 seconds)

Kumar Avinava Dubey vs Smt. Varsha Mishra on 30 July, 2019

5 CR-495-2019 "14. Learned amicus submitted that waiting period enshrined under Section 13-B(2) of the Act is directory and can be waived by the court where proceedings are pending, in exceptional situations. This view is supported by judgments of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in K. Omprakash vs. K. Nalini, Karnataka High Court in Roopa Reddy vs. Prabhakar Reddy, Delhi High Court in Dhanjit Vadra vs. Smt. Beena Vadra and Madhya Pradesh High Court in Dineshkumar Shukla vs. Neeta.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Bhim Sain vs Anisha And Another on 8 October, 2020

"13. Learned amicus submitted that waiting period enshrined under Section 13(B)2 of the Act is directory and can be waived by the court where proceedings are pending, in exceptional situations. This view is supported by judgments of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in K. Omprakash vs. K. Nalini 10, Karnataka High Court in Roopa Reddy vs. Prabhakar Reddy11, Delhi High Court in Dhanjit Vadra vs. Smt. Beena Vadra12 and Madhya Pradesh High Court in Dinesh Kumar Shukla vs. Smt. Neeta13.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - S Sharma - Full Document

Mr. Sandesh vs Harveen on 16 February, 2021

13. Learned amicus submitted that waiting period enshrined under Section 13(B)2 of the Act is directory and can be waived by the court where proceedings are pending, in exceptional situations. This view is supported by judgments of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in K. Omprakash vs. K. Nalini, Karnataka High Court in Roopa Reddy vs. Prabhakar Reddy11, Delhi High Court in Dhanjit https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ 11/18 C.R.P.No.93 of 2021 Vadra vs. Smt. Beena Vadra12 and Madhya Pradesh High Court in Dinesh Kumar Shukla vs. Smt. Neeta13.

Priyanka Chauhan vs Principal Judge Family Court And ... on 10 February, 2021

14. The learned amicus submitted that waiting period enshrined under Section 13-B(2) of the Act is directory and can be waived by the court where proceedings are pending, in exceptional situations. This view is supported by judgments of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in K. Omprakash vs. K. Nalini6, Karnataka High Court in Roopa Reddy vs. Prabhakar Reddy7, Delhi High Court in Dhanjit Vadra vs. Smt. Beena Vadra8, and Madhya Pradesh High Court in Dinesh Kumar Shukla vs. Smt. Neeta9.
Allahabad High Court Cites 36 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Rhythm Chauhan vs Smt. Neelam Nengnong ...Petitioner ... on 4 August, 2021

"13. Learned amicus submitted that waiting period enshrined under Section 13(B)2 of the Act is directory and can be waived by the court where proceedings are pending, in exceptional situations. This view is supported by judgments of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in K. Omprakash vs. K. Nalini 10, Karnataka High Court in Roopa Reddy vs. Prabhakar Reddy11, Delhi High Court in Dhanjit Vadra vs. Smt. Beena Vadra12 and Madhya Pradesh High Court in Dinesh Kumar Shukla vs. Smt. Neeta13.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - S Sharma - Full Document

Smt. Anita Kumari vs State on 5 October, 2021

"13. Learned amicus submitted that waiting period enshrined under Section 13(B)2 of the Act is directory and can be waived by the court where proceedings are pending, in exceptional situations. This view is supported by judgments of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in K. ::: Downloaded on - 31/01/2022 23:10:51 :::CIS 12 Omprakash vs. K. Nalini 10, Karnataka High Court in Roopa Reddy vs. Prabhakar Reddy11, Delhi High Court in .
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - S Sharma - Full Document

Smt. Anita Kumari vs State on 5 October, 2021

"13. Learned amicus submitted that waiting period enshrined under Section 13(B)2 of the Act is directory and can be waived by the court where proceedings are pending, in exceptional situations. This view is supported by judgments of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in K. ::: Downloaded on - 31/01/2022 23:10:51 :::CIS 12 Omprakash vs. K. Nalini 10, Karnataka High Court in Roopa Reddy vs. Prabhakar Reddy11, Delhi High Court in .
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - S Sharma - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 Next