Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.40 seconds)
Documents citing The New India Assurance Company Limited ... vs Padam Singh Son Of Shri Girwar Singh ... on 21 September, 2007

The New India Assurance Cop Ltd vs Smt. Mani on 21 August, 2008

The earlier ratio laid down by the Apex Court in case of New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Satpal Singh (supra) was tested in case of New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Asha Rani as referred to above, and the judgment in Satpal Singh's case was doubted, and it was held that in view of the amendment of 1994 it would only cover a third party as also the owner of goods or his authorised representative and not any passenger carried in goods vehicle, whether for hire or reward or otherwise.
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - S R Lodha - Full Document

National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Cholleti Bharatamma & Ors on 12 October, 2007

The learned counsel for the Insurance Company submitted that the issue involved in these appeals is squarely covered by the decision of the Supreme Court in the case reported in New Indian Assurance Company Ltd. v. Satpal Singh, 2000 ACJ. 1 wherein their Lordships held that under the Motor Vehicles Act 1988 all insurance Policies covering third party risks are not required to exclude gratuitous passengers in the Vehicle though Vehicle is of any type or class. In view of the proposition of law down by the Supreme Court in the decision stated supra, these appeals are dismissed. No costs.
Supreme Court of India Cites 19 - Cited by 279 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Smt. Jay Devi vs Sh. Ravi Verma S/O Sh. Chander Parkash ... on 27 July, 2015

22.Ld. counsel for the insurance company has placed reliance upon the MAC NO. 529F/13 SMT. JAY DEVI VS. RAVI VERMA & ORS. PAGE : 11/15 judgment of The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Kalia Devi & Ors., (Decided on 3.11.2014 by Hon'ble Delhi High Court), National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Swaran Singh & Ors. (2004)3SCC 297, Skandia Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Kokila Ben Chandravadan MANU/SC/0662/1987, (1987)2SCC 654, Sohan Lal Passi Vs. Sesh Reddy (1996) 5SCC 21, The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Kamla (2001) 4SCC 342 and Kusumlata Vs. Satbir.
Delhi District Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

National Insurance Company vs Abdul Karim & Others on 12 April, 2013

Sri R.K. Porwal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents relied upon the decision of the Tribunal and submitted that the deceased was 18 years old and was involved in the household services and was providing physical and mental contribution to the family, therefore, the evaluation of her service @ Rs.300/-per month and the annual evaluation at Rs.3600/- per annum cannot be said to be excessive. The multiplier applied at 25 times is also justified. He submitted that the multiplier has been applied having regard to the reasonable expected age of the deceased. Reliance is placed on the decisions of the Apex Court in the case of National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Swaran Singh and others, reported in (2004) 3 SCC 297, Lata Wadhwa and others Vs. State of Bihar and others, reported in (2001) 8 SCC 197, New India Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Padam Singh and others, reported in 2007 (4) TAC 388 and New India Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Smt. Shanti Pathak and others, reported in 2007 (4) TAC 17 (SC).
Allahabad High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - R Kumar - Full Document
1