Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (1.83 seconds)

S Sanaullah Baig vs M/O Communications on 13 December, 2023

Relying upon the above said judgment, this Tribunal, in OA 668/2011, vide order, dated 28.03.2012, allowed the OA filed by one C.Sampath. It is to be noted that the Hon. High Court of Kerala, vide its order, dated 13.09.2012, in WP (C) No.13489 of 2008, in UOI & others Vs K.Raghavan upheld the order, dated 15.10.2007, of the Ernakulam Bench of this Tribunal in OA 191/2006, holding that suo moto exercise of revisional power under Section 29 of CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965, after 14 months is not reasonable one and dismissed the writ petition filed by the respondent department. Following the said judgment, this Tribunal, vide order, dated 25.10.2013, has allowed OA 509/2012 and the said order was upheld by 14 OA 1309/2017 the Hon. High court of Madras in WP No.17278/2014, vide order dated 02.07.2014.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Madras Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1