Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.27 seconds)
Documents citing Narinder Singh vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 7 September, 2011

Ajit Singh vs State Of Punjab And Others on 7 August, 2013

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in an identical situation, this Court passed the order dated 22.11.2012 (Annexure P-3) and the present case is squarely covered by that order. He further submits that the petitioner will be satisfied in case respondent No.4 is directed to decide the legal notice dated 21.5.2013 (Annexure P-4) submitted by the petitioner, keeping in view the above said order dated 22.11.2012 passed by this Court in CWP No. 23039 of 2012 (Narinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab and Kumar Amit others).
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - R S Malik - Full Document

Abhey Singh And Others vs State Of Haryana on 29 July, 2013

Learned counsel for the appellants has not challenged the conviction recorded by the trial Court, but has submitted that occurrence relates to the last more than 20 years and since then the appellants are undergoing protracted trial. Appellant Bimla has already undergone incarceration for a period of 4 days and appellant Chugh Banita 2013.08.14 16:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Crl. A. No. 613 SB of 2001 -5- Noraj has undergone incarceration for a period of 11 days, out of their substantive sentence. Abhey Singh - appellant/co-accused has already died and appeal qua him has already been abated. The other party can be compensated with costs. To support his contention, learned counsel for the appellants has relied upon the authority reported as Narinder Singh vs. State of Punjab and others 2012 (1) RCR (Criminal) 173. It is further contended that Bimla is a lady and both the appellants Bimla and Noraj are on bail for the last more than 20 years. In case they are again sent to custody, it would disturb their family life.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 1 - K C Puri - Full Document
1