citedby: 34441090

Sumitra Devi And Others vs State Of Haryana And Others on 22 May, 2012

In support of these contentions, counsel for the petitioners has placed reliance upon the judgment of this Court in CWP No. 2579 of 1997 titled as Mukesh Kumar vs. State of Haryana and others, to contend that the instructions dated 26.07.1991 are applicable to the Police Department.

Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 18 - A G Masih - Full Document

Krishna Kumari vs State Of Haryana & Others on 20 April, 2012

(M.M. KUMAR) (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE JUDGE (RAJIV NARAIN RAINA) JUDGE April 20, 2012 'rajpal' * Sr.No. CWP No. Title 1 4303 of 2009 Krishna Kumari Vs. State of Haryana & others 2 1570 of 2007 Narender Kumar Vs. State of Haryana & others 3 10135 of 2007 Satish Kumar Vs. State of Haryana & others 4 11330 of 2008 Azad Singh Vs. State of Haryana & others 5 14689 of 2008 Deepak Kumar Vs. State of Haryana & others 6 7276 of 2008 Gaurav Vs. State of Haryana & others 7 5335 of 2009 Kaptan Singh Vs. State of Haryana & others 8 5760 of 2009 Rajesh Kumar Vs. State of Haryana & others 9 18600 of 2009 Rajinder v. Managing Director,UHBVNL & Ors. 10 20536 of 2009 Ravi Chauhan Vs. State of Haryana & others 11 1062 of 2010 Deepak & Anr. Vs. State of Haryana & others 12 11291 of 2009 Saroj Bala Vs. State of Haryana & others 13 14875 of 2009 Samindro Devi Vs. State of Haryana & others 14 14894 of 2009 Kamla Devi Vs. State of Haryana & others 15 947 of 2009 Saroj Rani Vs. State of Haryana & others 16 13735 of 2009 Nathi Ram Vs. State of Haryana & others CWP No.4303 of 2009 18 Sr.No. CWP No. Title 17 12717 of 2009 Saroj & Anr. Vs. State of Haryana & others 18 1580 of 2011 Leelawati Vs. State of Haryana & others 19 20148 of 2010 Santosh Vs. HVPNL & Ors. 20 8812 of 2009 Mukesh Rani Vs. State of Haryana & others 21 1655 of 2011 Amit Vs. State of Haryana & others 22 8070 of 2011 Saroj Vs. State of Haryana & others 23 4247 of 2011 Rahul Jain Vs. State of Haryana & others 24 8113 of 2011 Ratni Devi Vs. State of Haryana & others 25 4723 of 2007 Surender Singh Vs. State of Haryana & others 26 18572 of 2010 Bimla & Ors. Vs. State of Haryana & others 27 7765 of 2011 Murti Devi Vs. State of Haryana & others 28 19459 of 2008 Sonu Vs. State of Haryana & others 29 11521 of 2010 Parvesh Kumar Vs. State of Haryana & others 30 1114 of 2009 Shamdass Mehta Vs. State of Haryana & others 31 19316 of 2009 Shankar Singh Vs. State of Haryana & others 32 17681 of 2010 Bala Devi Vs. State of Haryana & others 33 21016 of 2010 Vidya Devi Vs. State of Haryana etc.

Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 37 - Cited by 0 - R Gupta - Full Document

) Crl.A.No. S-1393 Sb Of 2011 (O&M) vs State Of Haryana on 5 November, 2012

Vide this judgment, I intend to dispose of two appeals bearing Crl.A. No. S 1393 SB of 2011 titled as Parveen @ Beenu and Crl.A.No. S-1393 SB of 2011 (O&M) -2- another vs. State of Haryana and Crl.A. No. S 1756 SB of 2011 titled as Sonu vs. State of Haryana, as both these appeals have arisen out of same judgment. However, the facts are being taken from Crl.A. No. S-1393 SB of 2011.

Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - K C Puri - Full Document

Shamsher Singh And Others vs State Of Haryana And Others on 23 May, 2012

Petitioners were appointed on contract basis in the year 1993. A notification dated 28.07.1994 was issued by the Transport Commissioner, Haryana, wherein it was laid down that on completion of two years of service of the Conductors/Drivers, who have been appointed on contract basis, their services shall stand regularized against the vacant posts. Petitioners, after their appointment, were transferred to other depots. The services of the persons, who have been appointed after the petitioners, stand regularized from the year 1995-96 as per the instructions dated 28.07.1994. Petitioners were, however, regularized in the year 1998. Through the present petition, they are claiming the prior date of regularization in accordance with the judgments passed by this Court in CWP No. 14111 of 2001 titled CWP No. 9912 of 2012 2 as Pardeep Kumar and others vs. State of Haryana and others, decided on 18.05.2009 (Annexure P-9) and CWP No. 18401 of 2009 titled as Mukesh Kumar vs. State of Haryana and others, decided on 10.01.2012 (Annexure P-10).

Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A G Masih - Full Document

Date Of Decision : 24.1.2013 vs State Of Haryana on 24 January, 2013

Vide this order, I intend to dispose of two petitions bearing Crl.M.No. M-38441 of 2012 -2- Crl.M.No.M-38441 of 2012 titled as Pardeep Singh vs. State of Haryana and Crl.M.No. M-782 of 2013 titled as Mukesh @ Monu vs. State of Haryana, as both these petitions arise out of same FIR.

Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - K C Puri - Full Document

Bhupinder Singh vs State Of Punjab on 13 July, 2018

Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case and is behind bars since 02.7.2017. The conclusion of trial will take a long time. No useful 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 23-07-2018 00:38:58 ::: CRM-M-17516 of 2018 -2- purpose would be served by detaining the petitioner in jail. Relying upon the judgments passed in CRM-M-42099-2013 titled 'Pardeep Singh vs. State of Punjab, and CRM-M-779-2014 titled 'Lovepreet Singh vs. State of Punjab, decided on 26.5.2014 as well as CRM-M-5067-2018 titled 'Mukesh @ Sonu vs. State of Haryana', decided on 09.3.2018 passed by co-ordinate Benches of this Court, he prays for regular bail of the petitioner.

Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - R K Jain - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search