Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 24 (0.67 seconds)
Documents citing Arun Bhatiya vs Hdfc Bank on 8 August, 2022

Pankaj Sinha vs Hdfc Bank Through The Managing ... on 24 March, 2026

38. While advancing his submissions, Mr. Hooda urged that in view of the nature of the transactions, the judgment in the case of Arun Bhatiya vs. HDFC Bank and Ors. (supra) would not be attracted in as much as in that case, the banking services were of a joint Fixed Deposit Account with the Bank and, therefore, it is clearly distinguishable on facts as well as on law.
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 30 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ashutosh Tiwary vs Hdfc Bank Through The Managingdirecto ... on 24 March, 2026

38. While advancing his submissions, Mr. Hooda urged that in view of the nature of the transactions, the judgment in the case of Arun Bhatiya vs. HDFC Bank and Ors. (supra) would not be attracted in as much as in that case, the banking services were of a joint Fixed Deposit Account with the Bank and, therefore, it is clearly distinguishable on facts as well as on law.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 30 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Pankaj Sinha vs Hdfc Bank Through The Managing ... on 24 March, 2026

38. While advancing his submissions, Mr. Hooda urged that in view of the nature of the transactions, the judgment in the case of Arun Bhatiya vs. HDFC Bank and Ors. (supra) would not be attracted in as much as in that case, the banking services were of a joint Fixed Deposit Account with the Bank and, therefore, it is clearly distinguishable on facts as well as on law.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 30 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ashutosh Tiwary vs Hdfc Bank Through The Managingdirecto ... on 24 March, 2026

38. While advancing his submissions, Mr. Hooda urged that in view of the nature of the transactions, the judgment in the case of Arun Bhatiya vs. HDFC Bank and Ors. (supra) would not be attracted in as much as in that case, the banking services were of a joint Fixed Deposit Account with the Bank and, therefore, it is clearly distinguishable on facts as well as on law.
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 30 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Canara Bank vs Kavita Chowdhary on 15 April, 2026

48. This Court in Arun Bhatia Vs. HDFC Bank3 again examined the definition of ‘deficiency’ in terms of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Referring to the earlier decision in Sanjay Shankarsa Mamarde, this Court observed that the scope of ‘deficiency’ as defined under Section 2(1)(g) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is wide and has to be determined on the basis of the facts and circumstances of a particular case. 48.1. After referring to the definition of ‘service’ in the said enactment, this Court observed that service of every description will fall within the ambit of the definition of ‘services’ under Section 2(1)(o) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
Supreme Court of India Cites 48 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Procure Logistics Services Pvt. Ltd. vs Axis Bank Ltd. on 10 March, 2026

Due to inaction and refusal of OP, the Complainant had no option to approach the Hon‟ble Supreme Court by filing WP(C) No.77 of 2017 and thereafter WP(C) No.260 of 2017. Simultaneously, the Complainant instituted this Consumer Complaint alleging deficiency in service on the part of the OP in illegally refusing to accept cash deposits in a fully KYC-compliant account within the period permitted under law. The learned counsel argued that the refusal of the OP Bank to accept legitimate cash deposits during the notified period, despite complete KYC compliance and repeated disclosures by the Complainant, squarely amounted to deficiency in service, entitling them to reliefs sought from this Commission. He relied on Vivek Narayan Sharma & Ors. Vs. UOI, 2023 SCC OnLine SC 1; National Insurance Co. v. Harsolia Motors (2023) 8 SCC 362; Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust v. Unique Shanti Developers & Ors., (2020) 2 SCC 265; Canara Bank v. M/s. Jain Motor Trading Co., 2013 SCC OnLine NCDRC 656; Managing Director, Maharashtra State Financial Corporation v. Sanjay Shankarsa Mamarde, (2010)7 SCC 489; Kozyfex Mattresses Pvt. Ltd. v. SBI General Insurance Co. Ltd., (2024) 7 SCC 140; Sugandhi (Dead) through LRs v. P. Rajkumar, (2010) 10 SCC 706; and Arun Bhatiya v. HDFC Bank, 2022 INSC 804 in support of his arguments.
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Procure Logistics Services Pvt. Ltd. vs Axis Bank Ltd. on 10 March, 2026

Due to inaction and refusal of OP, the Complainant had no option to approach the Hon‟ble Supreme Court by filing WP(C) No.77 of 2017 and thereafter WP(C) No.260 of 2017. Simultaneously, the Complainant instituted this Consumer Complaint alleging deficiency in service on the part of the OP in illegally refusing to accept cash deposits in a fully KYC-compliant account within the period permitted under law. The learned counsel argued that the refusal of the OP Bank to accept legitimate cash deposits during the notified period, despite complete KYC compliance and repeated disclosures by the Complainant, squarely amounted to deficiency in service, entitling them to reliefs sought from this Commission. He relied on Vivek Narayan Sharma & Ors. Vs. UOI, 2023 SCC OnLine SC 1; National Insurance Co. v. Harsolia Motors (2023) 8 SCC 362; Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust v. Unique Shanti Developers & Ors., (2020) 2 SCC 265; Canara Bank v. M/s. Jain Motor Trading Co., 2013 SCC OnLine NCDRC 656; Managing Director, Maharashtra State Financial Corporation v. Sanjay Shankarsa Mamarde, (2010)7 SCC 489; Kozyfex Mattresses Pvt. Ltd. v. SBI General Insurance Co. Ltd., (2024) 7 SCC 140; Sugandhi (Dead) through LRs v. P. Rajkumar, (2010) 10 SCC 706; and Arun Bhatiya v. HDFC Bank, 2022 INSC 804 in support of his arguments.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S. Alpha Corp. Development Pvt. Ltd. vs Canara Bank on 18 July, 2024

51.     The question is as to whether the injunction orders as referred to above, between 26.11.2015 to 15.02.2016, culminating with the with the order of the Arbitrator can be taken protection of by the Bank under the garb that the borrower had obtained injunction orders. It is to be noted that it is the Bank, which is seeking the benefit of that injunction order and it is under the umbrella of the said order that the Bank refrained from encashing the bank guarantees. The Bank was under a legal obligation to satisfy the encashment, but it postponed the encashment on the ground of the interim orders obtained by the borrower. In this background, the impact and the consequence arising out of an interim order has to be legally dealt with. The law on this subject is that there is a difference between a stay order and a final order, in as much as, a stay order is an interim order that puts in abeyance any action, but does not dissolve it. It is only when final orders are passed affirming an interim order that it becomes absolute and is dependent on the final disposal of the lis. On the other hand, if the final order goes against the party, who had been successful in getting an interim relief or was being benefitted by it, then the successful party will have to be placed in the same position as was existing on the date of the lis on the principle of restitution that has been acknowledged to be a duty of the court in several decisions supported by authorities.
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Alpine Pressure Cooker And ... vs Punjab National Bank. & Anr. on 25 August, 2022

He further submitted that complaint of the complainant is maintainable under section 2(d)(ii) and (o) of the Consumer Protection Act and relied upon judgments, i.e. Arun Bhatia Vs. HDFC Bank, Civil Appeal No.5204-5205 of 2022, 2006 (5) Supreme Court Cases 727 and AIR 2007 MP 114, titled Laxmi Grih Udyog & Anr. Versus State of MP and Ors. 4 M/S Alpine Pressure Cooker versus Punjab National Bank (FA No.371/2019)
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next