Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.31 seconds)
Documents citing Punjab State Tubewell Corp.Tr.M.D. vs Harjinder Singh Sr.Canal Patwari on 26 March, 2014

State vs Harjinder Singh & Ors. on 1 July, 2019

17) There is no evidence on record that the gate­passes as relied upon by the prosecution are in the handwriting of accused persons. It is not proved that those gate­passes have the signatures of accused persons. It is not proved on record that the paper stock which have been mentioned on those gate­passes are that stock only which was actually misappropriated. Finding a mistake in the procedure is a different thing from establishing the identification of the property which was allegedly misappropriated. There was no effort on the part of the prosecution to link the entries in the gate­passes as to the movements of the stocks to the alleged misappropriated paper stock. It is to be reminded here that this court is not conducting a departmental or fact finding inquiry against accused persons. This court is dealing with the poser of misappropriation of certain articles by the accused persons in the capacity of public servants and in these circumstances it was required for the case of the prosecution to connect the articles mentioned in the gate­passes to the paper stock allegedly misappropriated. The case of the prosecution is silent on this aspect. This fact State Vs. Harjinder Singh & Ors; CIS No. 294747/16;
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Harjinder Singh on 4 February, 2015

10. The MLC of the deceased Virender Sharma of Yashoda Hospital clearly shows the date of accident as 20.07.2008 at 5:15p.m in which "alleged history of RTA" has been mentioned by the doctor. The MLC also suggests that the injured was brought to the hospital by another injured Anil Sharma. The death report of the deceased Virender Sharma issued by Aruna Asaf Ali, Government Hospital and the postmortem report are on record. The above medical documents produced by the prosecution clearly show that the injured Virender Sharma succumbed to his injuries. Accused caused the fatal accident of the injured due to which he lost his life. No reason has been assigned by the accused for his false implication in the present case. The circumstantial evidence has duly proved that accused was very much present on the spot at the time of FIR NO.377/2008 PS Anand Vihar PAGE 8/9 STATE vs. HARJINDER SINGH accident and caused the accident while driving DTC bus no. DL­1PB­0839.
Delhi District Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Bhaiya Lal vs The State Of M.P. And Ors. on 5 December, 2022

(ix) That, on 05.05.1986, Ceiling Case No. 1/161-A 90 (B-3) 82-83 State Vs. Sanman Singh, Patwari gave his report of Village Dhaniya Khedi and on the basis of the said report, proceedings under the provisions of the Act, 1960 were started against Sanman Singh. The Sub Divisional Officer namely B.B. Khare acting as a competent authority under the provisions of the Act, 1960 started proceedings. In the ceiling case, Patwari submitted his report and finally the competent authority passed an order on 24.02.1997 in which the sale deed executed by Sanman Singh and his legal heirs with effect from the period 1977 to 1983 has been set aside, saying that the same is illegal and the sale deed in regard to the area 40.56 acres has been declared void. It was also observed that total 117.57acres out of which 57.82 (irrigated) and as such, 33.57 acres non-irrigated and 16.78 acres irrigated land was declared surplus and direction was issued to prepare the settlement as per Section 11(3) of the Act, 1960.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - S Dwivedi - Full Document
1