Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.48 seconds)
Documents citing Delhi Assam Roadways Corporation Ltd. vs The United India Insurance Co. Ltd. on 3 September, 2013

Raipur Power & Steel Ltd. vs The New India Insurance Co.Ltd. on 13 October, 2015

8. Shri Shekhar Amin, learned counsel appearing for the respondent (O.P.) has supported the impugned order passed by the learned District Forum and has argued that the impugned order is just and proper and does not suffer from any infirmity and illegality and does not call for any interference by this Commission. The appellant (complainant) violated the terms and conditions of the insurance // 11 // policy, therefore, the respondent (O.P.) has rightly repudiated the claim of the appellant (complainant). Hence, the appeal is liable to be dismissed. He placed reliance on Delhi Assam Roadways Corporation Limited vs. United India Insurance Company Limited, IV (2013) CPJ 334 (NC).
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 11 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

M/S. Ahaar Feeds vs Future Generali India Insurance ... on 18 January, 2019

6.      The learned counsel for the respondent relies upon the decisions of this Commission in RP No. 3960 of 2013 DARCL Logistics Ltd. Vs. ICICI Lombard GIC Ltd. & Ors., decided on 02.11.2015; RP No.2636 of 2010 National Insurance Company Limited Vs. Usha Devi, decided on 13.07.2011 and RP No. 3228 of 2012 Delhi Assam Roadways Corporation Ltd. Vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd., decided on 03.09.2013.
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 5 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

National Insurance Co.Ltd., vs 1. Vanama Laxmi And Others on 30 September, 2013

20. The National Insurance Company Ltd has relied upon the decisions, Ankit Goel(supra) and Sonal Spices Pvt Ltd(supra) and M/s Aerolex India Pvt Ltd vs New India Assurance Company Pvt Ltd 2012 NCJ 512. . This Commission allowed the appeal of the respondent no.5-company herein on the premise that M/s Sahara India Pvt Ltd proved that the copy of insurance policy was given to the depositor and as such the complainant was held to have knowledge of terms and conditions of the insurance policy.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1