Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.38 seconds)
Documents citing Suresh Chandra (Minor-B.C.) vs Ramu @ Ram Kumar Chaudhary on 3 August, 2010

State vs Ram Kumar on 19 October, 2011

The contentions of ld. Amicus curiae that having not found any injury on the private part of the prosecutrix ex­facie indicates that no rape could have been committed. Ld. APP opposing the aforesaid contentions of the Amicus Curiae contended that in case 'B.C. State Vs Ram Kumar FIR no.149/10 21 / Deva Vs. State of Karnataka 2007 VII AD (S.C.) 143= 2007 12 SCC 122, it has been held that merely because no injury was found on the private parts of the prosecutrix would not negate her testimony about the rape committed on her.
Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Suresh Chand vs State Of U.P. And 7 Ors. on 18 December, 2019

The petitioner has preferred the instant writ petition challenging the impugned order dated 20.2.2013 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bulandshahr in Complaint Case No. 10765 of 2010, Suresh Chand v. Ram Kumar and others, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, Bulandshahr as well as order dated 19.2.2015 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bulandshahr in Revision No. 88 of 2013.
Allahabad High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - V K Singh - Full Document
1