Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.86 seconds)
Documents citing M/S Jsw Steel Limited & Ors vs Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory ... on 2 January, 2019

Jsw Steel Limited vs Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory ... on 2 August, 2021

Hindalco Industries Limited vs. Uttar Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission [Appeal No. 125 of 2012]; iv. India Glycols Limited vs. Uttarakhand Electricity Regulatory Commission [Appeal No. 112 of 2014]; v. M/S. JSW Steel Limited v. Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission [Appeal No. 333 of 2016]; vi. JSW Steel Limited v. Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission [Appeal No. 278 and 293 of 2015].
Appellate Tribunal For Electricity Cites 40 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Ultratech Cement Ltd & Anr vs Karnataka Electricity Regulatory ... on 9 April, 2019

25. They heavily rely upon decision of the co-ordinate Bench of this Tribunal in JSW Energy Steel Limited vs. Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission (in Appeal No. 278 of 2015 and batch dated 2.1.2019). On perusal of this decision, we note that the controversy which arose for consideration of the Bench in those batch of Appeals is exactly the same in these Appeals. It would be just and proper to quote the issues raised in those Appeals and how they were considered by the co-ordinate Bench. The judgment in Century Rayon, the full Bench judgment in Lloyd Metals by this Tribunal as well as the Judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Hindustan Zinc Limited, are discussed at length and have answered ultimately that co-generation facilities irrespective of fuel are to be promoted in terms of Section 86(1)(e) of the Electricity Act. Therefore, they cannot be fastened with the obligation of Renewable Purchase Obligation under the same provisions of the Act. The relevant paragraphs are as under:
Appellate Tribunal For Electricity Cites 19 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

Century Rayon vs The Maharashtra Electricity ... on 28 January, 2020

14. It is the submission of the Appellant that the aforequoted decision dated 26.04.2010 in the case of Century Rayon vs MERC & Ors. (supra) has been consistently followed in various later decisions of this Tribunal, reference being made particularly to judgment dated 01.10.2014 in Appeal No. 112 of 2014 - India Glycols Limited vs Uttarakhand Electricity Regulatory Commission, judgment dated 30.01.2013 in Appeal No. 54 of 2012 - M/s Emami Paper Mills Ltd vs Odhisha Electricity Regulatory Commission & Ors., and judgment dated 02.01.2019 in Appeal No. 278 of 2015 - M/s JSW Steel Limited vs Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission.
Appellate Tribunal For Electricity Cites 29 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rajasthan Renewable Energy ... vs M/S. Shree Cement Ltd & Ors on 16 April, 2019

"25. They heavily rely upon decision of the co-ordinate Bench of this Tribunal in JSW Energy Steel Limited vs. Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission (in Appeal No. 278 of 2015 and batch dated 2.1.2019). On perusal of this decision, we note that the controversy which arose for consideration of the Bench in those batch of Appeals is exactly the same in these Appeals. It would be just and proper to quote the issues raised in those Appeals and how they were considered by the co-ordinate Bench. The judgment in Century Rayon, the full Bench judgment in Lloyd Metals by this Tribunal as well as the Judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Hindustan Zinc Limited, are discussed at length and have answered ultimately that co- generation facilities irrespective of fuel are to be promoted in terms of Section 86(1)(e) of the Electricity Act. Therefore, they cannot be fastened with the obligation of Renewable Purchase Obligation under the same provisions of the Act."
Appellate Tribunal For Electricity Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1