Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 189 (1.46 seconds)
Documents citing State Of Bihar & Ors vs Amrendra Kumar Mishra on 26 September, 2006

Amrendra Kumar Rawat @ Arvind Kumar vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. on 18 December, 2024

It is also prayed that operation and implementation of order dated 20.11.2024 passed by passed by Additional District & Sessions Judge / Special Judge, POCSO Act-II, Ayodhya (Faizabad) in Criminal Case No. 233/2020 (State Vs Amrendra Kumar Rawat @ Arvind Kumar) under S. 302, 201 IPC, PS Rudauli, Ayodhya (Faizabad) may kindly be stayed during the pendency of present petition."
Allahabad High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - S Lavania - Full Document

Kusheshwar Mandal And Ors vs The State Of Bihar And Ors on 3 April, 2019

In view of such submission the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the authorities to consider claim of the petitioners and if the same is found similarly situated and covered by the judgment in the case of State of Bihar & ors vs. Harendra Mishra, it is needless to say that the petitioner would be entitled to the same treatment as the petitioners in the said case.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - M Prasad - Full Document

Koushal Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 5 November, 2019

In my view, Mr. Pandey, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Board, is correct in his submission in the light of the Supreme Court's decision in case of State of Bihar and others vs. Amrendra Kumar Mishra (supra), wherein the Supreme Court did not approve of exercise of jurisdiction by the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India while directing the respondents to allow a candidate to join against a post though he had failed to join within the stipulated time.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - C S Singh - Full Document

Dilip Kumar Singh vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors on 17 September, 2021

7. Reverting to the facts of the present case and following the decisions of the Supreme Court in the matters of Amrendra Kumar Mishra (supra) and Jagdish Chopra (supra), it is quite vivid that even if the subject rules under which recruitment is held do not provide for any validity period of select list, but in absence of any rule, ordinary period of validity of select list should be one year as held by the Supreme Court in Amrendra Kumar Mishra (supra) and that has been followed by the Supreme Court in Jagdish Chopra (supra). In the present case, the select list was published on 25.6.2011 and wait list was also published on 25.6.2011 and even validity of select is to be taken as one year in absence of validity period in applicable service rules that has already been expired on 25.6.2012 and the writ petition was filed by the petitioner on 22.8.2013, as such, validity of wait list has already expired and therefore, a writ of mandamus cannot be issued in favour of the petitioner.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - S Agrawal - Full Document

Md. Arif Hussain And Ors vs The State Of Bihar And Ors on 27 March, 2019

In view of such submission the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the authorities to consider claim of the petitioners and if the same is found similarly situated and covered by the judgment in the case of State of Bihar & ors vs. Harendra Mishra, it is needless to say that the petitioner would be entitled to the same treatment as the petitioners in the said case.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - M Prasad - Full Document

Suresh Prasad Yadav And Ors vs The State Of Bihar And Ors on 27 March, 2019

In view of such submission the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the authorities to consider claim of the petitioners and if the same is found similarly situated and covered by the judgment in the case of State of Bihar & ors vs. Harendra Mishra, it is needless to say that the petitioner would be entitled to the same treatment as the petitioners in the said case.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - M Prasad - Full Document

Kumari Baby Rani And Ors vs The State Of Bihar And Ors on 3 April, 2019

In view of such submission the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the authorities to consider claim of the petitioners and if the same is found similarly situated and covered by the judgment in the case of State of Bihar & ors vs. Harendra Mishra, it is needless to say that the petitioner would Patna High Court CWJC No.10553 of 2016(7) dt.03-04-2019 3/3 be entitled to the same treatment as the petitioners in the said case.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - M Prasad - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next