Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (1.22 seconds)
Documents citing Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. vs Digamber Jain Secondary School on 12 February, 2002

The Executive Officer/Joint ... vs The Registrar on 28 January, 2011

22. The learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner thereafter relied upon a Division Bench of the Rajasthan High Court in Union of India and others v. Digamber Jain Secondary School reported in 2003-I-LLJ 398. In that case a private educational institution in the State of Rajasthan which was having recognition and grant-in-aid was held to be covered by Section 16(1)(b) as a scheme framed by the State Government for the benefits similar to the PF Act was in force.
Madras High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - K Chandru - Full Document

M/S Aniket College Of Social Work vs Asstt.Provident Fund Commissioner on 11 August, 2017

11. The judgment of Union of India and others vs. Digamber Jain Secondary School, 2003 I CLR 233, has no applicability to the factual matrix of the present appeal. The Hon'ble Supreme Court was considering a factual scenario where the Rajasthan Non-Government Educational Institutions (Recognition-Grant-in-Aid and Service Conditions) Rules, 1993 provided for contributory provident fund benefits and in the context of the statutory provisions of the State Act, the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 would not apply to the establishments belonging to or under the control of the State Government.
Bombay High Court Cites 30 - Cited by 0 - R B Deo - Full Document

Regional Provident Fund Commissioner ... vs Lusian Jyoti Kumar S/O Late Gregori on 16 November, 2015

2]81]616@& dk Hkqxrku tuojh] 2001 esa dj fn;k x;k A izkFkhZ ij deZpkjh isa'ku ;kstuk] 1995 ykxw ugha gksrh] blfy, eap dks is'a ku lEcU/kh izdj.k lquus dk {ks=kf/kdkj ugha gS A ifjoknh dk ifjokn [kkfjt fd;k tkos A foi{kh la- 2 us ftyk eap ds le{k ifjokn dk tcko izLrqr dj O;Dr fd;k gS fd ifjoknh dh is'a ku jkf'k jksds tkus dh dksbZ lwpuk muds ikl ugha gS A mRrjnkrk us vizkFkhZ la- 1 dks Hkfo"; fuf/k jkf'k fHktokus ds fy, i= izsf"kr dj fn;k gS] tSls gh vizkFkhZ la- 1 ls jkf'k izkIr gksxh og fu;ekuqlkj izkFkhZ dks vnk djus ds fy, rS;kj gSa A mUgsa vuko';d i{kdkj cuk;k x;k gS A muds fo:) ifjoknh dk ifjokn [kkfjt fd;k tkos A geus mHk; i{k dh cgl lquh rFkk i=koyh ij miyC/k lkexzh dk voyksdu fd;k A foi{kh la- 3 dh vksj ls dksbZ mifLFkr ugha vk;k A fo)ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ us cgl dh gS fd Rajasthan Non Govt Educational Institutions Act, 1989 ds vqulkj ftyk eap dks ,sls ekeys lquus dk {ks=kf/kdkj ugha gS A bl izdkj ds ekeys f'k{kk vfHkdj.k )kjk gh lqus tk ldrs gSa A bl lEcU/k esa vihykFkhZ us ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; dh S.B. Civil Writ petition No. 1085 of 2000 (Balbari Vidya Mandir, Chure Vs. State & Ors.) decided on 16th January, 2001 and D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ ) No. 87 of 2002 (U.O.I. Vs. Digamber Jain Secondary School) decided on 12th Fabruary, 2002 ,oa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; 2007 (1) RLW 788 (Sanatan Dharam Girls Secondary School & Ors.) fu.kZ; fnukad 30&10&2006 ds &4&
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.807/1999 vs . on 30 October, 2014

3. Mr. V.K. Aggarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the controversy that recognized private educational institutions covered by the State control or aided under the Grant-in- Aid Rules, is exempted from the provisions of the PF Act of 1952 and this controversy has been settled by this Court as well as by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the judgment annexed with the writ petition in the case of Union of India & Ors. Vs. Digamber Jain Secondary reported in 2002 (3) WLC 74 and by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Vs. Sanatan Dharam Girls Secondary School & Ors. (Appeal (Civil) No.7016/2004 decided on 30.10.2006).
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - V Kothari - Full Document
1