Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.98 seconds)
Documents citing Girdhari Lal Son Of Shri Sher Singh vs Shashi Kumari Wife Of Shri Girdhari Lal ... on 5 December, 2016

M/S United India Insurrance Company ... vs Smt. Jai Lakshmi Singh And Others on 8 April, 2022

25. Moreover, in Girdhari Lal v. Radhey Shyam [Girdhari Lal v. Radhey Shyam, 1993 SCC OnLine P&H 194 : PLR (1993) 104 P&H 109] , Sudama Devi v. Kewal Ram [Sudama Devi v.Kewal Ram, 2007 SCC OnLine P&H 1208 : PLR (2008) 149 P&H 444] andPazhaniammal case [New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Pazhaniammal, 2011 SCC OnLine Ker 1881 : 2012 ACJ 1370] our own Hon'ble High Court has held that ''it is, prima facie safe to conclude in claim cases that the accident has occurred on account of rash or negligent driving of the driver, if the driver is facing the criminal trial on account of rash or negligent driving.'
Allahabad High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - K Thaker - Full Document

Smt. Vinita Kesarwani And Others vs The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. And ... on 1 April, 2022

25. Moreover, in Girdhari Lal v. Radhey Shyam [Girdhari Lal v. Radhey Shyam, 1993 SCC OnLine P&H 194 : PLR (1993) 104 P&H 109] , Sudama Devi v. Kewal Ram [Sudama Devi v.Kewal Ram, 2007 SCC OnLine P&H 1208 : PLR (2008) 149 P&H 444] andPazhaniammal case [New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Pazhaniammal, 2011 SCC OnLine Ker 1881 : 2012 ACJ 1370] our own Hon'ble High Court has held that ''it is, prima facie safe to conclude in claim cases that the accident has occurred on account of rash or negligent driving of the driver, if the driver is facing the criminal trial on account of rash or negligent driving.'
Allahabad High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 2 - A Tyagi - Full Document

Smt. Kusuma Devi And 4 Others vs Shrawan Kumar Mishra And 2 Others on 18 May, 2022

25. Moreover, in Girdhari Lal v. Radhey Shyam [Girdhari Lal v. Radhey Shyam, 1993 SCC OnLine P&H 194 : PLR (1993) 104 P&H 109] , Sudama Devi v. Kewal Ram [Sudama Devi v.Kewal Ram, 2007 SCC OnLine P&H 1208 : PLR (2008) 149 P&H 444] andPazhaniammal case [New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Pazhaniammal, 2011 SCC OnLine Ker 1881 : 2012 ACJ 1370] our own Hon'ble High Court has held that ''it is, prima facie safe to conclude in claim cases that the accident has occurred on account of rash or negligent driving of the driver, if the driver is facing the criminal trial on account of rash or negligent driving.'
Allahabad High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 1 - A Tyagi - Full Document

Smt. Geeta Yadav And Others vs Prem Roadways Registered And Another on 18 May, 2022

25. Moreover, in Girdhari Lal v. Radhey Shyam [Girdhari Lal v. Radhey Shyam, 1993 SCC OnLine P&H 194 : PLR (1993) 104 P&H 109] , Sudama Devi v. Kewal Ram [Sudama Devi v.Kewal Ram, 2007 SCC OnLine P&H 1208 : PLR (2008) 149 P&H 444] andPazhaniammal case [New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Pazhaniammal, 2011 SCC OnLine Ker 1881 : 2012 ACJ 1370] our own Hon'ble High Court has held that ''it is, prima facie safe to conclude in claim cases that the accident has occurred on account of rash or negligent driving of the driver, if the driver is facing the criminal trial on account of rash or negligent driving.'
Allahabad High Court Cites 39 - Cited by 0 - A Tyagi - Full Document

Suraj Mukhi And 2 Others vs Sunil Garg And Another on 21 March, 2022

25. Moreover, in Girdhari Lal v. Radhey Shyam [Girdhari Lal v. Radhey Shyam, 1993 SCC OnLine P&H 194 : PLR (1993) 104 P&H 109] , Sudama Devi v. Kewal Ram [Sudama Devi v.Kewal Ram, 2007 SCC OnLine P&H 1208 : PLR (2008) 149 P&H 444] andPazhaniammal case [New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Pazhaniammal, 2011 SCC OnLine Ker 1881 : 2012 ACJ 1370] our own Hon'ble High Court has held that ''it is, prima facie safe to conclude in claim cases that the accident has occurred on account of rash or negligent driving of the driver, if the driver is facing the criminal trial on account of rash or negligent driving.'
Allahabad High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - A Tyagi - Full Document

Gopi Charan vs Smt. Rekha Dwivedi And Another on 4 March, 2022

25. Moreover, in Girdhari Lal v. Radhey Shyam [Girdhari Lal v. Radhey Shyam, 1993 SCC OnLine P&H 194 : PLR (1993) 104 P&H 109] , Sudama Devi v. Kewal Ram [Sudama Devi v.Kewal Ram, 2007 SCC OnLine P&H 1208 : PLR (2008) 149 P&H 444] andPazhaniammal case [New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Pazhaniammal, 2011 SCC OnLine Ker 1881 : 2012 ACJ 1370] our own Hon'ble High Court has held that ''it is, prima facie safe to conclude in claim cases that the accident has occurred on account of rash or negligent driving of the driver, if the driver is facing the criminal trial on account of rash or negligent driving.'
Allahabad High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - A Tyagi - Full Document

Smt. Shalini Srivastava And Others vs U.P. State Road Transport Corp. Ltd. ... on 4 March, 2022

25. Moreover, in Girdhari Lal v. Radhey Shyam [Girdhari Lal v. Radhey Shyam, 1993 SCC OnLine P&H 194 : PLR (1993) 104 P&H 109] , Sudama Devi v. Kewal Ram [Sudama Devi v.Kewal Ram, 2007 SCC OnLine P&H 1208 : PLR (2008) 149 P&H 444] andPazhaniammal case [New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Pazhaniammal, 2011 SCC OnLine Ker 1881 : 2012 ACJ 1370] our own Hon'ble High Court has held that ''it is, prima facie safe to conclude in claim cases that the accident has occurred on account of rash or negligent driving of the driver, if the driver is facing the criminal trial on account of rash or negligent driving.'
Allahabad High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - A Tyagi - Full Document

Balbir Singh vs Kiran Bala And Another on 23 January, 2023

The respondent being government employee admittedly in Irrigation Department of Punjab has been drawing his salary more than 4 of 7 ::: Downloaded on - 25-01-2023 05:03:19 ::: CRR(F)-207 of 2022 Rs.60,000/- to 70,000/- per month but has concealed the same deliberately on record otherwise must have brought his salary record on the record for showing his bona-fide and resulting of which, it concluded from the rival circumstances of the parties that the applicant no.1 is entitled to enhanced amount of maintenance more than of Rs.10,000/- per month but has claimed enhanced amount of maintenance of Rs.10,000/- per month only from the date of filing this application filed on 24.02.2014 till entitlement of the same by the applicants from the respondent as per view taken in Girdhar Lal Vs. Shashi Kumari, 2017(2) CCC- 745(HP), Rajnesh Vs. Neha and anr 2021-SCC- 324, Seema and another Vs.Gourav Juneja with Gourav Juneja Vs. Seema and another 2019(2)RCR(Crl)219,Madhu and another Vs. Rajesh Gupta 2019(4) RCR(Crl.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1