Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.31 seconds)
Documents citing Doctor Hukam Chand Dhawan vs State Of Punjab Through Secretary To ... on 17 March, 1997

Rajinder Pal Singh vs Surinder Kaur on 29 August, 2023

This view has been followed consistently by this Court in a number of cases i.e. United Commercial Bank and Another (supra), Rajinder Singh (supra), Ram Pal (supra) and Dr. Hukam Chand Dhawan (supra). However, the argument raised by learned counsel for the petitioner that the shops in dispute could not have been got vacated for a non-residential purpose since they were residential in nature is devoid of merit. None of the judgments relied upon by learned counsel for the petitioner and which have been referred to above lay down any such thing. In none of the cases, the issue raised before the Courts was the one which is being raised by learned counsel for the petitioner. The reliance upon the said judgments is, therefore, not of any aid to the petitioner.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Pawan Kumar Mittal vs Girdhari Lal Saroya on 25 November, 2009

12. Sequelly, it is now well settled proposition of law that the landlord is best judge in regard to his bonafide need. If he considers Civil Revision No.3064 of 2007 6 that the existing accommodation is insufficient and he required better and more accommodation, such need has to be seen from the angle of the landlord and not from the view point of the tenant and opinion of the tenant cannot be imported in it. Reliance in this connection can be placed on the judgment of this Court in Dr.Hukam Chand Dhawan Vs. State of Punjab 1997 (1) RCR 652 and M/s Bajaj Associates and others Vs. Vinod Kumar and others (2009-1) PLR 443.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 3 - M S Sullar - Full Document

Mohinder Kaur vs Balwinder Kumar on 27 November, 2009

Above all, it is now well settled proposition of law that the landlord is best judge in regard to his bonafide need.If she considers that the existing accommodation is insufficient and she required Civil Revision No.2177 of 2008 14 better and more accommodation, such need has to be seen from the angle of the landlady and not from the view point of the tenant. The opinion of the tenant cannot be imported in it. Reliance in this connection can be placed on the judgments of this Court in Dr.Hukam Chand Dhawan Vs. State of Punjab 1997 (1) RCR 652 and M/s Bajaj Associates and others Vs. Vinod Kumar and others (2009-1) PLR 443.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 5 - M S Sullar - Full Document
1