Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 24 (0.99 seconds)
Documents citing Athar Pervez vs State on 26 February, 2016

Hemant Soren vs Directorate Of Enforcement on 3 May, 2024

However, at the same time taking a cue from the observation made in the case of "Athar Pervez Vs. State" (supra) to meet the ends of justice it would suffice that the petitioner be permitted to attend the last rites of his uncle scheduled to be held on 06.05.2024 under police custody, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall not indulge himself in any public speeches and shall have no interaction with any media personnel or any witness of this case. The administration shall ensure that these conditions are strictly complied with. It shall also ensure maintenance of law and order at the venue in question.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - R Mukhopadhyay - Full Document

Arvind Kejriwal vs Directorate Of Enforcement on 10 May, 2024

13. Athar Pervez v. State8, a judgment of the Delhi High Court authored by one of us (Sanjiv Khanna), on the power to grant interim bail in cases registered under the NDPS Act, in addition to the judgments noted, refers to Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra and Others 9, which decision leans on the Constitutional Bench judgment in Shri Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia and Others v. State of Punjab10, and Central Inland Water Transport Corporation Limited and Another v. Brojo Nath Ganguly and Another11, and observes:
Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - D Datta - Full Document

Shahid Miah On Behalf Of Accused Of ... vs The State Of Tripura on 27 November, 2024

Taking part in the hearing, Learned Senior Counsel, Mr. S. Sarkar first of all drawn the attention of the Court that in the case at hand from the contents of the FIR, it is not clear that the contraband items was actually seized from the residence of the accused person- in-custody because prosecution in this regard could not submit any Page 2 of 6 documentary evidence before the Court. Learned Senior Counsel further submitted that since last 240 days the accused is lodging in jail and furthermore, the prosecution in this case has failed to comply with the provision of Section 42(2) of NDPS Act and furthermore, the minor son of the accused person-in-custody is suffering from dengue for which Learned Counsel submitted that the accused may be released on bail in any condition. Since the IO of this case has laid the charge-sheet against the accused-in-custody, Learned Senior Counsel also in support of his submission further submitted that if at this stage if it is not possible to grant regular bail so in pursuance of the judgment of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court reported in (2016) SCC OnLine Del 6662 (Athar Pervez vs. State) dated 26.02.2016 he may be released at least on interim bail for the purpose of treatment of his minor son and referred para No.22 of the said judgment:
Tripura High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sanjay Dhali vs State Of Odisha ...... Opp. Party on 12 February, 2025

15. But in view of the fact that the petitioner is in custody for over an year and trial has not started on account of the failure of the police to arrest the co- accused and the decision of the Delhi High Court in the case of Athar Pervez vs State: 2016 SCC OnLine Del 6662 and the Supreme Court in the case of Arvind Kejriwal v. Directorate of Enforcement, (2024) 9 SCC 577 on grant of interim bail , I am inclined to grant interim bail to the petitioner for a period of three months.
Orissa High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Jeevanand Haldar vs State Of Odisha ...... Opp. Party on 12 February, 2025

13. Considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 27.03.2023 (almost two years), and fortified by the decision of the Delhi High Court in the case of Athar Pervez vs State: 2016 SCC OnLine Del 6662 and the Supreme Court in the case of Arvind Kejriwal v. Directorate of Enforcement, (2024) 9 SCC 577 on grant of interim bail, I am inclined to direct for release of the petitioner on interim bail for a period of three months, so as to enable him to arrange for his defence, if any.
Orissa High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - S Ratho - Full Document

An Application Under Section 439 Of The ... vs State Of Odisha ...... Opp. Party on 19 February, 2025

7. Considering the said submission of the counsel and the aforesaid decisions, I am not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioners but in view of the fact that the petitioners are in custody for about one year and nine months and keeping in mind the decision of the Delhi High Court in the case of Athar Pervez vs State: 2016 SCC OnLine Del 6662 and the Supreme Court in the case of Arvind Kejriwal v. Directorate of Enforcement, (2024) 9 SCC 577 on grant of interim bail, I am inclined to direct for release of the petitioners on interim bail for a period of three months.
Orissa High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - S Ratho - Full Document

An Application Under Section 439 Of The ... vs State Of Odisha ...... Opp. Party on 19 February, 2025

7. Considering the said submission of the counsel and the aforesaid decisions, I am not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioners but in view of the fact that the petitioners are in custody for about one year and nine months and keeping in mind the decision of the Delhi High Court in the case of Athar Pervez vs State: 2016 SCC OnLine Del 6662 and the Supreme Court in the case of Arvind Kejriwal v. Directorate of Enforcement, (2024) 9 SCC 577 on grant of interim bail, I am inclined to direct for release of the petitioners on interim bail for a period of three months.
Orissa High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - S Ratho - Full Document

Sinu Beero vs State Of Odisha ...... Opp. Party on 19 February, 2025

14. While rejecting the prayer for bail, keeping in mind the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 30.07.2023, and keeping in mind the decision of the Delhi High Court in the case of Athar Pervez vs State: 2016 SCC OnLine Del 6662 and the Supreme Court in the case of Arvind Kejriwal v. Directorate of Enforcement, (2024) 9 SCC 577 on grant of interim bail, I am inclined to direct for release of the petitioners on interim bail for a period of three months.
Orissa High Court Cites 30 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next