Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 16 (0.71 seconds)
Documents citing Vinay Kumar Pappu & Ors vs The Union Of India & Ors on 2 March, 2016

Union Of India And 4 Others vs Pappu Kumar And 13 Others on 17 May, 2024

(a). The judgement and the order dated 03.03.2021 of the Tribunal in O.A. No. 608 of 2014 (Pappu Kumar and others v. Union of India and others) impugned in the leading writ petition, the order dated 17.08.2021 of the Tribunal in O.A. No. 208 of 2020 (Sunil Kumar and others Vs. Union of India and another) impugned in the connected C1 writ petition, the order dated 02.02.2023 of the Tribunal in O.A. No. 1044 of 2019 (Vijay Kumar Yadav and others Vs. General Manager North Eastern Railway Gorakhpur, District Gorakhpur and others) impugned in the connected C2 writ petition, the order dated 31.10.2018 of the Tribunal in O.A. No. 330/00807 of 2014 (Bhupendra Kumar Yadav and others Vs. Union of India and another) impugned in the connected C3 writ petition, the order dated 27.09.2013 of the Tribunal in O.A. No. 831 of 2013 impugned in the connected C4 writ petition, are set aside.
Allahabad High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - D Y Chandrachud - Full Document

Vinay Kumar vs Scientific And Industrial Research on 30 January, 2026

(emphasis supplied) It follows from the judgments quoted above that appointment on compassionate ground cannot be construed as a never ending entitlement to be invoked at any point of time. Rather, it is a scheme to provide succor to the family to help deal with the immediate crisis faced by the family of the deceased employee on his death in harness. Page 4 of 6 CAT, Lucknow Bench O.A. No. 332/00740 of 2024 Vinay Kumar Vs. UOI & Ors. 6.3 The emergent need of the family is manifested in the diligence with which the family pursue the case for compassionate appointment with the authorities concerned and in seeking legal remedy, if required. Unexplained delay on part of the family to pursue the case for compassionate appointment can be fatal to their claim. The door for compassionate appointment cannot be kept open indefinitely if the family of the deceased employee display a lack of urgency in pursuing their case.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Lucknow Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mahendra Sutradhar And 76 Ors vs The Union Of India And 2 Ors on 11 June, 2019

In their affidavit- in- opposition, the respondents had disclosed the reason that they were obeying the order dated 14.02.2012 passed by the Delhi High Court in WP(C) 7651/2012- Vinay Kumar Vs. Union of India & others , while declaring the final result only after Review Medical Examination. The relevant portion of the said judgment and order by the Division Bench is quoted below:-
Gauhati High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - K R Surana - Full Document

Rajesh Yadav & Ors vs N E Rly. on 15 May, 2026

(a). The judgement and the order dated 03.03.2021 of the Tribunal in O.A. No. 608 of 2014 (Pappu Kumar and others v. Union of India and others) impugned in the leading writ petition, the order dated 17.08.2021 of the Tribunal in O.A. No. 208 of 2020 (Sunil Kumar and others Vs. Union of India and another) impugned in the connected C1 writ petition, the order dated 02.02.2023 of the Tribunal in O.A. No. 1044 of 2019 (Vijay Kumar Yadav and others Vs. General Manager North Eastern Railway Gorakhpur, District Gorakhpur and others) impugned in the connected C2 writ petition, the order dated 31.10.2018 of the Tribunal in RITU RAJ SINGH 15 O.A. No. 330/00807 of 2014 (Bhupendra Kumar Yadav and others Vs. Union of India and another) impugned in the connected C3 writ petition, the order dated 27.09.2013 of the Tribunal in O.A. No. 831 of 2013 impugned in the connected C4 writ petition, are set aside
Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad Cites 37 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sunil Kumar vs Chairman Railway Recruitment Cell N E ... on 15 May, 2026

(a). The judgement and the order dated 03.03.2021 of the Tribunal in O.A. No. 608 of 2014 (Pappu Kumar and others v. Union of India and others) impugned in the leading writ petition, the order dated 17.08.2021 of the Tribunal in O.A. No. 208 of 2020 (Sunil Kumar and others Vs. Union of India and another) impugned in the connected C1 writ petition, the order dated 02.02.2023 of the Tribunal in O.A. No. 1044 of 2019 (Vijay Kumar Yadav and others Vs. General Manager North Eastern Railway Gorakhpur, District Gorakhpur and others) impugned in the connected C2 writ petition, the order dated 31.10.2018 of the Tribunal in O.A. No. 330/00807 of 2014 (Bhupendra Kumar Yadav and others Vs. Union of India and another) impugned in the connected C3 writ petition, the order dated 27.09.2013 of the Tribunal in O.A. No. 831 of 2013 impugned in the connected C4 writ petition, are set aside
Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad Cites 37 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

S K Yadav vs Union Of India on 15 May, 2026

(a). The judgement and the order dated 03.03.2021 of the Tribunal in O.A. No. 608 of 2014 (Pappu Kumar and others v. Union of India and others) impugned in the leading writ petition, the order dated 17.08.2021 of the Tribunal in O.A. No. 208 of 2020 (Sunil Kumar and others Vs. Union of India and another) impugned in the connected C1 writ petition, the order dated 02.02.2023 of the Tribunal in O.A. No. 1044 of 2019 (Vijay Kumar Yadav and others Vs. General Manager North Eastern Railway Gorakhpur, District Gorakhpur and others) impugned in the connected C2 writ petition, the order dated 31.10.2018 of the Tribunal in O.A. No. 330/00807 of 2014 (Bhupendra Kumar Yadav and others Vs. Union of India and another) impugned in the connected C3 writ petition, the order dated 27.09.2013 of the Tribunal in O.A. No. 831 of 2013 impugned in the connected C4 writ petition, are set aside
Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad Cites 36 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shiv Bahadur Verma vs Railway Recruitment Cell on 15 May, 2026

(a). The judgement and the order dated 03.03.2021 of the Tribunal in O.A. No. 608 of 2014 (Pappu Kumar and others v. Union of India and others) impugned in the leading writ petition, the order dated 17.08.2021 of the Tribunal in O.A. No. 208 of 2020 (Sunil Kumar and others Vs. Union of India and another) impugned in the connected C1 writ petition, the order dated 02.02.2023 of the Tribunal in O.A. No. 1044 of 2019 (Vijay Kumar Yadav and others Vs. General Manager North Eastern Railway Gorakhpur, District Gorakhpur and others) impugned in the connected C2 writ petition, the order dated 31.10.2018 of the Tribunal in O.A. No. 330/00807 of 2014 (Bhupendra Kumar Yadav and others Vs. Union of India and another) impugned in the connected C3 writ petition, the order dated 27.09.2013 of the Tribunal in O.A. No. 831 of 2013 impugned in the connected C4 writ petition, are set aside
Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad Cites 35 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Bhupendra Kumar Yadav vs M/O Railways on 15 May, 2026

(a). The judgement and the order dated 03.03.2021 of the Tribunal in O.A. No. 608 of 2014 (Pappu Kumar and others v. Union of India and others) impugned in the leading writ petition, the order dated 17.08.2021 of the Tribunal in O.A. No. 208 of 2020 (Sunil Kumar and others Vs. Union of India and another) impugned in the connected C1 writ petition, the order dated 02.02.2023 of the Tribunal in O.A. No. 1044 of 2019 (Vijay Kumar Yadav and others Vs. General Manager North Eastern Railway Gorakhpur, District Gorakhpur and others) impugned in the RITU RAJ connected C2 writ petition, the order dated 31.10.2018 of the Tribunal in SINGH O.A. No. 330/00807 of 2014 (Bhupendra Kumar Yadav and others Vs. 15 Union of India and another) impugned in the connected C3 writ petition, the order dated 27.09.2013 of the Tribunal in O.A. No. 831 of 2013 impugned in the connected C4 writ petition, are set aside
Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad Cites 37 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Vijay Kumar Yadav vs Secretary Ministry Of Railway on 15 May, 2026

(a). The judgement and the order dated 03.03.2021 of the Tribunal in O.A. No. 608 of 2014 (Pappu Kumar and others v. Union of India and others) impugned in the leading writ petition, the order dated 17.08.2021 of the Tribunal in O.A. No. 208 of 2020 (Sunil Kumar and others Vs. Union of India and another) impugned in the connected C1 writ petition, the order dated 02.02.2023 of the Tribunal in O.A. No. 1044 of 2019 (Vijay Kumar Yadav and others Vs. General Manager North Eastern Railway Gorakhpur, District Gorakhpur and others) impugned in the connected C2 writ petition, the order dated 31.10.2018 of the Tribunal in O.A. No. 330/00807 of 2014 (Bhupendra Kumar Yadav and others Vs. Union of India and another) impugned in the connected C3 writ petition, RITU RAJ SINGH 16 the order dated 27.09.2013 of the Tribunal in O.A. No. 831 of 2013 impugned in the connected C4 writ petition, are set aside
Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad Cites 37 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next