Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 123 (1.95 seconds)
Documents citing Tehseen Poonawalla vs Union Of India on 19 April, 2018

Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay vs Union Of India on 29 April, 2026

74. More recently, this Court in National Federation of Indian Women v. Union of India23, was approached under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking enforcement and compliance of the directions issued in Tehseen Poonawalla (supra) concerning incidents of lynching and mob violence. While examining the maintainability and feasibility of such 23 Writ Petition (Civil) No. 719 of 2023 W.P.(C)No.943 of 2021 etc.etc. Page 72 of 125 a course, this Court observed that it would not be appropriate for this Court, sitting at the national level, to monitor incidents occurring across various States.
Supreme Court of India Cites 101 - Cited by 0 - V Nath - Full Document

R.Sakkarapani vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 3 August, 2018

76. There can be no doubt, as observed by the Supreme Court in Tehseen Poonawalla v. Union of India and another, reported in 2018 SCC Online SC 400, that public interest litigation has over the years been brazenly mis-utilized by persons with personal agenda and such misuse is a serious matter. However, in the facts of this case, where, as observed above, 94% of the elections have, as aforesaid, gone uncontested and nominations have been rejected on an unprecedented scale, it cannot be said that this writ petition is frivolous.
Madras High Court Cites 107 - Cited by 0 - P T Asha - Full Document

R.Sakkarapani vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 3 August, 2018

76. There can be no doubt, as observed by the Supreme Court in Tehseen Poonawalla v. Union of India and another, reported in 2018 SCC Online SC 400, that public interest litigation has over the years been brazenly mis-utilized by persons with personal agenda and such misuse is a serious matter. However, in the facts of this case, where, as observed above, 94% of the elections have, as aforesaid, gone uncontested and nominations have been rejected on an unprecedented scale, it cannot be said that this writ petition is frivolous.
Madras High Court Cites 104 - Cited by 2 - P T Asha - Full Document

Jishan vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 19 November, 2024

7. The reason that police did not conduct even a cursory search for the murder weapons viz. rods, batons, lathis and other blunt weapons. This is despite the fact that the postmortem report discloses the ante mortem blunt instrument injuries. (Annexure postmortem). The reason 8 / 21 that only 5 persons have been made accused even though three vehicles with a combined seating capacity of 15 men are seized. And then the victims and their next of kin have informed that they were being chased by about 15 men. The reason that no FIR is registered against the policemen at the spot, including two policemen seen casually walking about at the crime scene even as the victims lay injured and dying. No action whatsoever has been taken against them in violation of Arumugam Servai v. Tamil Nadu reported in (2011) 8 SCC 405, and all in all none of the guidelines of the Tahseen Poonawalla v. Union of India, reported in (2018) 9 SCC 501 have been followed.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 35 - Cited by 0 - R Sinha - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next