Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.33 seconds)
Documents citing Akhilesh Singh vs State Of Chhattisgarh 4 Wpc/1446/2018 ... on 18 May, 2018

Mr. Rizwan Pasha vs Smt. Sumanamurali on 8 December, 2025

The Hon'ble Allahabad High Court held in the case of Akhilesh Singh Vs. Vijay Singh & anr., reported in 2003 SCC Online All 1391 at para 6 -9- NC: 2025:KHC:52049 CRP No. 456 of 2024 HC-KAR that "In view of what has been discussed above it has to be held that where there are several co-owners one of them alone cannot terminate the tenancy unless he is the landlord or has the consent express or implied of the other co-landlords. The revision is allowed. The order of the Judge Small Causes dated 19-8- 2002 is set aside."
Karnataka High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - V Srishananda - Full Document

Pal Vikram Rameshbhai vs Chairman - Recruitment Board on 18 July, 2022

25. Other two decisions cited by the learned Advocate for the petitioner in case of High Court of Panjab and Haryana (supra) and the decision in Page 11 of 12 Downloaded on : Wed Jul 20 20:59:02 IST 2022 C/SCA/1895/2017 ORDER DATED: 18/07/2022 case of Joginder Pal and others (supra), it would be enough to mention that both the cases had arisen as off suit of the decision of Apex Court in case of Inderpreet Singh Kahlon and others (supra), as it was pertaining to the same tainted recruitment process attributed to malpractice typical to the facts of those case.
Gujarat High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A Y Kogje - Full Document

Sumit Jawakar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 3 September, 2025

4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that in the instant case, charge sheet was filed but along with the same, no FSL report was filed. Therefore, applicant is entitled to be released on bail under Section 187(3) of BNSS. With respect to aforesaid, learned counsel for the applicant has relied Signature Not Verified Signed by: SARSWATI MEHRA Signing time: 03-09-2025 19:13:08 NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-JBP:42545 2 MCRC-28309-2025 upon Than Singh Vs. The State of M.P. (MCRC No. 7751/2025) decided on 25.02.2025. Applicant is in jail since 13.03.2025. Therefore, learned trial Court has erred in dismissing applicant's application for default bail. The trial of the case will take considerable time. Therefore, it has been prayed that the applicant be released on bail pending the trial.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - A K Paliwal - Full Document

Iqbal Ahmad Lari vs Smt. Naghma on 2 December, 2019

The petitioner?s contention is that plaintiff alone cannot terminate its tenancy. This is mixed question of fact and law which can be determined of the Small Causes Court after adducing evidence by rival parties . It is still upon to the Small Causes Court that after parties adduce their evidence, if it comes to the conclusion that there is a dispute as to the title, then the suit application can be returned. Therefore, the judgment relied by the petitioner in case of Akhilesh Singh Vs. Vijay Singh and others reported in 2004(1) ARC 2013 is of any avail to the petitioner unless and until said mixed question of law and fact is determined, after parties adduce their evidence. This writ petition is premature and therefore it is dismissed.
Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - V Agarwal - Full Document

Raj Kumar And 12 Others vs State Of U.P. And Another on 11 October, 2023

2. By means of instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C, the applicants seeks to quash the summoning order dated 25.07.2023 including the entire proceeding of Complaint Case No. 413 of 2023 (Akhilesh Vs. Raj Kumar and others), under sections 147, 323, 452, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station Newadhiya, District Jaunpur, pending in the court of Civil Judge (S.D.)/F.T.C., Jaunpur and further prayer to stay the further proceedings of the aforesaid case has been made.
Allahabad High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next