Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 143 (2.13 seconds)
Documents citing Maharishi Mahesh Yogi Vedic ... vs State Of M.P. And Ors. on 20 March, 2002

Maharashi Mahesh Yogi Vedic ... vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 27 July, 2012

It is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and therefore the authorities would be at liberty to examine the matter keeping all facts and facets W.P. No.10593/2012 (Maharshi Mahesh Yogi Vedic Vishwavidyalaya Vs. State of M.P. & ors) into consideration and thereafter either accept or reject the representation by passing a reasoned order.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 12 - Full Document

Maharishi Mahesh Yogi Vedic ... vs Prof. Ved Prakash on 12 April, 2017

“ One other relevant factor which is also to be kept in mind is the establishment of the appellant University at the repeated persuasion of Maharshi Mahesh Yogi was definitely to provide full-fledged education on the Vedas and the various intricate subjects, which are found in Vedas, as well as its practices, Ithihas, Puranas etc. In fact, there can be no two opinion that such an institution with such a laudable objective for imparting education in different fields based on the teachings in Vedas, was very rare and it is said that the appellant University is stated to be an unique University created and established by the founders of the said institution headed by Maharshi Mahesh Yogi. Therefore, when such a premium University, which is stated to be only one of its kind in the whole of the Country was successfully established based on the 1995 Act, in our considered opinion, such a well established institution should be allowed to survive by enabling the said University to conduct courses as has been planned by it and introduced under Ordinance 15 and thereby, make the appellant University a viable one. Such an approach alone, in our considered view, ensure the successful existence and continued running of the University in the further years and thereby, benefit very many aspirants from among the younger generation who wish to learn more and more about very many subjects by understanding such subjects based on the teachings that are found and established in Vedic learnings, its practices, Ithihas and Puranas etc. Therefore, on this ground as well, in our considered opinion, any attempt made from any quarters, which would disrupt the running of the appellant University, will only amount to interfering with its various Constitutional rights and fundamental rights enshrined in the Constitution. Therefore, when such interference is brought to the notice of this Court, the Court has to necessarily come to the rescue of the appellant University by saving it from any such onslaught being made on its continued existence. We, therefore, find force in the submission of the learned senior counsel for the appellant while attacking the amended Section 4(1) and its proviso, by which the appellant University was deprived of its valuable right to hold very many programmes in the conduct of the course enumerated in its Ordinance 15, which consequently resulted in violation of its Constitutional, as well as Fundamental Rights in the running of its educational institutions.” In the view of the facts and circumstances, as enumerated above, and the observations and directions of the Supreme Court made in para 113 in the case of Maharishi Mahesh Yogi Vedic Vishwavidyalya (Supra), I.A. Nos. 1864/2017, 1865/2017 and I.A. No.4051/2017 filed in Contempt Petition No. 2259/2016 are disposed of with a direction to the respondent UGC to take a decision on the applications filed by the petitioner or on the applications that may be filed by the petitioner seeking to run on campus and off campus courses and Open Distant Education Centres within the State of M.P. in accordance with law and the above quoted decision of the Supreme Court as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of two weeks.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Maharishi Mahesh Yogi Vedic ... vs University Grants Commission on 12 April, 2017

“ One other relevant factor which is also to be kept in mind is the establishment of the appellant University at the repeated persuasion of Maharshi Mahesh Yogi was definitely to provide full-fledged education on the Vedas and the various intricate subjects, which are found in Vedas, as well as its practices, Ithihas, Puranas etc. In fact, there can be no two opinion that such an institution with such a laudable objective for imparting education in different fields based on the teachings in Vedas, was very rare and it is said that the appellant University is stated to be an unique University created and established by the founders of the said institution headed by Maharshi Mahesh Yogi. Therefore, when such a premium University, which is stated to be only one of its kind in the whole of the Country was successfully established based on the 1995 Act, in our considered opinion, such a well established institution should be allowed to survive by enabling the said University to conduct courses as has been planned by it and introduced under Ordinance 15 and thereby, make the appellant University a viable one. Such an approach alone, in our considered view, ensure the successful existence and continued running of the University in the further years and thereby, benefit very many aspirants from among the younger generation who wish to learn more and more about very many subjects by understanding such subjects based on the teachings that are found and established in Vedic learnings, its practices, Ithihas and Puranas etc. Therefore, on this ground as well, in our considered opinion, any attempt made from any quarters, which would disrupt the running of the appellant University, will only amount to interfering with its various Constitutional rights and fundamental rights enshrined in the Constitution. Therefore, when such interference is brought to the notice of this Court, the Court has to necessarily come to the rescue of the appellant University by saving it from any such onslaught being made on its continued existence. We, therefore, find force in the submission of the learned senior counsel for the appellant while attacking the amended Section 4(1) and its proviso, by which the appellant University was deprived of its valuable right to hold very many programmes in the conduct of the course enumerated in its Ordinance 15, which consequently resulted in violation of its Constitutional, as well as Fundamental Rights in the running of its educational institutions.” In the view of the facts and circumstances, as enumerated above, and the observations and directions of the Supreme Court made in para 113 in the case of Maharishi Mahesh Yogi Vedic Vishwavidyalya (Supra), I.A. Nos. 1864/2017, 1865/2017 and I.A. No.4051/2017 filed in Contempt Petition No. 2259/2016 are disposed of with a direction to the respondent UGC to take a decision on the applications filed by the petitioner or on the applications that may be filed by the petitioner seeking to run on campus and off campus courses and Open Distant Education Centres within the State of M.P. in accordance with law and the above quoted decision of the Supreme Court as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of two weeks.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Maharashi Mahesh Yogi Vedic ... vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 27 July, 2012

It is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and therefore the authorities would be at liberty to W.P. No.10596/2012 (Maharshi Mahesh Yogi Vedic Vishwavidyalaya Vs. State of M.P. & ors) examine the matter keeping all facts and facets into consideration and thereafter either accept or reject the representation by passing a reasoned order.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mahesh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 21 September, 2021

In view of above, it is directed that in case it is found that the classification of the petitioners is intact, the petitioners shall be paid minimum of the pay scale admissible to the post on which they have been classified as permanent employee without any increment. If HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH AT GWALIOR W.P. No. 17529/2021 ( Mahesh and others Vs. The State of M.P & others) (3) any arrears are worked out, the same shall be paid as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of three months.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - S A Dharmadhikari - Full Document

Mahesh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 6 September, 2017

The execution of remaining jail sentence of appellant Kapoori Bai is hereby suspended and it is ordered that Cr.A. No.604/2017 (Mahesh and others Vs. State of M.P.) she be released on bail upon her furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with one solvent surety of the same amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court, subject to depositing of fine amount, if it is not so far deposited, at the time of furnishing bail-bonds.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Dharmendra Prajapati vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 25 June, 2015

28), it is not open to the respondents to contend that petitioner is not eligible. In addition he relied on executive instruction dated 10.9.2010 to contend that for issuance of diploma in Computer Application, all the Universities which are recognized from UGC are authorized to issue certificate. It is contended that the action of the respondents is arbitrary in not treating the petitioner as eligible. In the course of argument, Shri D.P.Singh also relied on Section 37(A) of Maharishi Mahesh Yogi Vedic Vishwavidyalaya Adhiniyam. He also relied on 2002 (2) MPHT 353 (DB) (Maharishi Mahesh Yogi Vedic Vishwavidyalaya and others Vs. State of M.P. & Ors.).
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 9 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next