Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.46 seconds)

Nathulal S/O Heeralal (Decd.) Thru. Lrs ... vs Ramesh on 28 August, 2019

13. This Court in the case of Firm Jethmal Bakhtawarmal through Proprietor vs. Smt.Chandrakanta Jain & others (Misc. Petition -9- M.P.No.6237/2018 No.1158/2017 dated 06.07.2018) has held that carbon copy prepared along with original is also an original copy. Against the aforesaid judgment an SLP (SLP No.24753/2018) was filed and that has been dismissed by order dated 28.09.2018.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 1 - V Rusia - Full Document

Radheshyam Soni vs Rajendra Kumar Soni on 16 February, 2024

4] The petition is opposed by Shir Vivek Phadke, learned counsel for the respondents/defendants, and it is submitted that no case for interference is made out as the learned Judge of the trial Court has rightly allowed the applications considering the fact that the original documents are lying with the plaintiffs only. Counsel has also relied upon the decision rendered by the coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Firm Jethmal Bakhtawarmal throuhg Proprietor vs. Smt. Chandrakanta Jain and others passed in M.P. No.1158 of 2017 on 06/07/2018 and it is submitted that the documents can be brought on record in evidence, however, it can be appreciated by the trial Court at the time of delivery of judgement, as the Supreme Court in the case of Rakesh Mohindra vs. Anita Beri reported as (2016) 16 SCC 483 has held that neither mere admission of a document in evidence amounts to its proof nor mere making of an exhibit of a document dispense with its Signature Not Verified Signed by: KHEMRAJ JOSHI Signing time: 3/4/2024 6:41:10 PM proof, which is otherwise required to be done in accordance with law. Thus, it is submitted that no case for interference is made out. 5] Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents filed on record.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - S Abhyankar - Full Document
1