Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 30 (1.70 seconds)
Documents citing Meera Bai vs Icici Lombard General Insurance ... on 13 January, 2020

Sunita vs Anil Kumar And Ors on 24 May, 2025

In support of her contention, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon the judgments of Hon'ble Apex Court, in case titled as Ranjeet Page 24 of61 Sunita vs Anil Kumar and ors. Page 25 of61 and Anr. Vs Abdul Kayam Neb and anr., in Civil Appeal, arising out of SLP (C) No. 10351/2019, decided on 25.02.2025, ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Rajani Sahoo & Ors, in Civil Appeal, arising out of SLP (C) No. 29302 of 2019, decided on 02.01.2025, Meera Bai and Ors. Vs ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. and Anr., in Civil Appeal, arising out of SLP (C) No. 3886 of 2019, decided on 30.04.2025, Mangla Ram vs Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., (2018) 2 ACC 118.
Delhi District Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

National Insurance Company Ltd vs Maheshwari Devi & Ors on 24 December, 2025

b. In Meera Bai & Ors. v. ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr.9, also, the High Court had reversed the award of the Tribunal granting compensation to the family of the deceased victim. The Supreme Court noted that the owner/driver of the insured vehicle had not led any evidence before the Tribunal and held that the filing of a chargesheet, even in the absence of eyewitness testimony, would militate against a finding of absence of negligence.
Delhi High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - P Jalan - Full Document

Veena Rani & Ors vs Daksh Jindal & Ors on 16 January, 2026

In this regard, beneficial reference is made to decision rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Meera Bai and others vs. ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd. and another, 2025(2) RCR (Civil) 747, wherein, there was no eye witness account coming forth, learned Court took into consideration the fact of FIR having been lodged and chargesheet having filed against the owner and driver of the offending vehicle and on this account, it was observed that there could be no finding that the negligence was not established. It was held that absence of eye witness does not automatically negate the establishment of negligence, when FIR and chargesheet are filed against the owner and driver of the offending vehicle.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - A Puri - Full Document
1   2 3 Next