Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.35 seconds)
Documents citing Delhi Chemical And Pharmaceutical ... vs Himgiri Realtors Pvt. Ltd. & Ors on 21 September, 2023

M/S Omaxe Ltd vs M/S Superior Finelease Ltd on 12 November, 2025

2021/DHC/1928-DB" and it has been held that execution petitions or applications for enforcement of commercial awards are applications falling within purview of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and such executions applications can be enterained and executed only the Commercial Courts. The relevant observations of the Hon'ble Division Bench in Delhi Chemicals (supra) are being reproduced hereinbelow:
Delhi District Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

India) vs M/S.Kalinga Insulation on 3 December, 2025

In a case before Delhi High Court, i.e. Delhi Chemical and Pharmaceutical Works Pvt. Ltd. and another vs. Himgiri Realtors Pvt. Ltd. and another, 2021 SCC OnLine Del 3603, the learned Single Judge while dealing with same question has observed that, as far as the interpretation of application of the proviso to sub-section (1) and sub- section (1-A) is concerned such proviso was there before the amendment and even after insertion of sub-section (1-A) after the amendment and is pari materia to the erstwhile proviso to sub-section C.M.P. No.1480 of 2025 Page 19 of 21 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: BASANTA KUMAR BARIK Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 08-Dec-2025 15:02:03 (1) and there is nothing in the proviso specifically to indicate that the same is applicable only to sub-section (1-A).
Orissa High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - B P Routray - Full Document

Kelvin Buildcon Private Limited, ... vs M/S Krrish Realtech Private Limited & ... on 18 December, 2023

3. Further, by the same order, the Judgment Debtors were directed to file fresh affidavits of their assets. The said direction has evidently not been complied with, as no list of assets of Judgement Debtor No. 1 is found on record. The direction must be complied within two weeks from today. Although counsel for the Decree Holder had pressed for the affidavit to be filed in terms of the judgment of this Court in M/s Bhandari Engineers & Builders Pvt Ltd v. M/s Maharia Raj Joint Venture & Ors.1, however, in the opinion of this Court, the same cannot be insisted upon since the said judgement has been set aside by the Division Bench in Delhi Chemical and Pharmaceutical Works Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Himgiri Realtors Pvt. Ltd 2. As far as Judgment Debtor No. 2 is concerned, they have filed an affidavit giving the status/ title of plots settled to be given to the Decree Holder.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - S Narula - Full Document
1