Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.56 seconds)
Documents citing Bhagwati Gases Ltd. vs Cce on 9 January, 2008

Hishine Inks Pvt Ltd vs Valsad on 2 November, 2018

4|Page E/10314/2016-DB  Rajguru Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CC (Export)-2011 (266) ELT 286 (Export)  Bhagwati Gases Ltd. Vs. CCe- 2008 (226) ELT 478 (T)  Coastal Gases & Chemicasl Pvt Ltd. Vs. CCE-1988 (33) ELT 437 (T)  CCE Vs. Maharashtra State Bureau of Test Book Production & Curriculum Research-2015 (39) STR 235 (T)  Wimco Limited Vs. CCE 1986 (26) ELT 877 (T)  Zenith Spinners Vs. UOI-2015 (326) ELT 97 (Guj.)
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Bansal Iron & Steel Rolling Mills vs Cce & S.T., Chandigarh-I on 21 August, 2014

5. On being questioned, as to how the appeals have been filed before Tribunal against communication of Asstt. Commissioner, ld. Advocate appearing for the appellant clarifies that it is not the decision of the Asstt. Commissioner himself, but vide the said communication he is only communicating the decision of the Commissioner. As such, as per the law declared by the Tribunal in the case of Bhagwati Gases Ltd. vs. CCE, Jaipur-I reported in 2008 (226) ELT 468 (Tri-Del.) such orders of the Commissioners, though communicated by the Asstt. Commissioner, would be appealable before the Tribunal. We agree with the above contention of the ld. Advocate. Inasmuch as it is the orders of the Commissioner, though taken on file, which are being communicated by the Asstt. Commissioner, we are of the view that the appeals are maintainable before Tribunal.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 6 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

4. Whether Order Is To Be Circulated To ... vs Cce, Jaipur on 9 January, 2009

2. Shri Atul Gupta, Company Secretary and Shri Bipin Garg, Advocate, the learned Counsels on behalf of the Appellant pleaded that the Assistant Commissioners letter withdrawing the earlier acceptance of the proof of export has to be treated as an appealable decision and in this regard he cited the Tribunals order in the case of Bhagwati Gases Ltd. vs. CCE, Jaipur  I reported in 2008 (85) R.L.T. 153 (CESTAT  Del.). They also pleaded that the Tribunal is competent to decide this appeal as the impugned order relates to maintainability of the appeal against the Assistant Commissioners letter and does not relate to the export of goods outside India without payment of duty.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S. Shital Internatioanl vs Cce, Ludhiana on 15 October, 2009

In view of the above decision, communication dated 24.3.2009 of the Asst. Commissioner communicating the direction of the competent authority is set aside. The matter is remanded back to the Commissioner to pass a fresh order on merit in accordance with law. Needless to say that the Commissioner shall give reasonable opportunity of hearing to the appellants before passing the order. Appeal is allowed by way of remand.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1