In Re: Mohd. Mehfooj vs Mohd. Shamim on 4 November, 2022
10 . AR GU M EN TS ON lai na nt is a dis tan t
un sel for the ac cu sed arg ue d tha t co mp
Co
10 .l. Pe r co ntr a, Ld . loa n
sed ne ve r too k an y
an d ha d vis iti ng ter ms , ho we ve r, ac cu
rel ati ve of ac cu sed
yt;cLW ~
Page 7 of 18
hd. Shamim
Mohd. Mchfooj Vs. Mo
CC No .205/2021
to
the che que in question
alle ged and nev er gav e
om the com pla ina nt as and
had pur cha sed a pro per ty
pla ina nt. Ld. Cou nse l furt her arg ued that acc use d
com
visi ted the dea ler ' s office
pla ina nt had intr odu ced him to the sell er and he had
com
sign ed che que s and the
pla ina nt car ryin g a bag wh ich was hav ing his bla nk
with com
com pla ina nt mig ht have
had bee n left at the bui lde r/de ale r's office and
said bag
ued that acc use d had
que in que stio n the n onl y. Ld. Cou nse l furt her arg
stol en the che e is
pla ina nt to him and the sam
dem and not ice sen t by com
giv en the rep ly to the legal
DW -1. Ld. Cou nse l further
his test imo ny rec ord ed as
filed by the acc use d dur ing t
9,0 0,0 00/ -to acc use d wit hou
tha t the com pla ina nt gav e hug e am oun t of Rs.
arg ued
by com pla ina nt in
or doc um ent and also the said loan was not sho wn
any agr eem ent
has
r arg ued tha t com pla ina nt
sam e. Ld. Cou nse l fur the
his ITR des pite fili ng the gra b
e aga ins t him in ord er to
len the che que s of acc use d and filed the false cas
sto
mo ney .