Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.35 seconds)

Genpact India Private Limited vs Delhi-Iv on 13 February, 2026

 Tata Teleservices (Maharashtra) Ltd vs. CST - 2024 (3) TMI 1407 CESTAT MUMBAI LB  Tata Advanced Materials Ltd vs. CCE & ST - 2017 (7) TMI 57 CESTAT Bangalore  24/7 Customer Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Tax Bengaluru East - 2021 (3) TMI 414 CESTAT Bangalore  CCE vs. Convergys India Services Pvt Ltd - 2017 (48) STR 173 (Tri Chandigarh)  Overseas Infrastructure Albance (I) Pvt Ltd vs. Commr of CGST - 2021 (44) GSTL 379 (Tri Mumbai)  Warburg Pincus India Pvt Ltd vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai - 2018 (364) ELT 159 (Tri Mumbai)  Olam Information Services Private Limited vs. Commissioner of Central GST & Excise, Chennai -
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 33 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Utsah Engg P Ltd vs Noida on 25 October, 2018

5. It is seen that Tribunal in the case of Tata Advanced Materials Ltd. vs. C.C.E, C. & S.T., Bangalore-I reported at 2015 (322) E.L.T. 540 (Tri.-Bang.) has dealt with an identical situation in a case of credit taken twice, and observed that the same stands reversed by the assessee along with interest and in the absence of any mala fide, the appellant deserves a lenient view. By observing so the Tribunal set aside the 3 APPEAL No. E/70313/2018-EX[SM] penalty imposed under Rule 15 of the Cenvat Credit Rules read with Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1