Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.53 seconds)
Documents citing M/S A.K. Woolen Industries & Ors vs Shri Narain Gupta on 31 October, 2017

Shri Brahm Dev Sharma vs ) Shri Kanwar Kishore Nagpal on 29 August, 2022

In A.K. Woolen Industries v. Narain Gupta 2017 (2) RCR (Rent) 653, the Coordinate Bench of this Court held that ground floor is more suitable for commercial purposes and further in Praveen Kumar RC ARC 25471/2016 Brahm Dev Sharma v. Kanwar Kishore & Anr. Page 16 of 19 Arora v. Akashay 2019 I AD (Delhi) 741 wherein it was held the needs of the shop on the ground floor needs to be viewed from the different perspective than the availability of the business space on the upper floors. Also, the same applies for the second floor as well as third floor which is stated to be the residence of the petitioner.
Delhi District Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shri Quazi Mohammed Ahmed vs Miohammed Sultan on 12 May, 2023

In any event the judgment relied upon by the Respondent of AK Woollen Industries (supra) also applies to the facts of this case and negates Signature Not Verified RC.REV. 181/2020 Page 13 of 17 Digitally Signed By:MAHIMA SHARMA Signing Date:15.05.2023 18:37:49 Neutral Citation Number: 2023:DHC:3353 the argument of the Petitioner, inasmuch as it is a fact that a ground floor premises for opening a new photo studio located on the main road is bound to attract more footfall than a photo studio located in a residential building on an upper floor.
Delhi High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - M P Arora - Full Document

Kuldeep Raj Arora vs Rohtash Kumar Seewal & Ors on 7 May, 2019

In A.K.Woolen Industries & Others vs Narain Gupta 2017(2) RCR (Rent) 653, the Coordinate Bench of this Court held that ground floor is RC.REV. 83/2018 Page 8 of 10 more suitable for commercial purposes and further in Praveen Kumar Arora vs Akshay 2019 I AD (Delhi) 741 wherein it was held the needs of the shop on the ground floor needs to be viewed from the different perspective than the availability of the business space on the upper floors, hence there is no ground to interfere with the view of the learned Trial Court.
Delhi High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 1 - Y Khanna - Full Document

Late Sh. Bhai Gopal Dass Through Legal ... vs Atul Jain & Anr. & Ors. on 17 May, 2023

(Emphasis Supplied) 15.4. To the same effect, another Coordinate bench of this Court in M/s A.K. Woolen Industries & Ors. v. Shri Narain Gupta, 2017 SCC OnLine Del 11363, at paragraph 25, has relied upon the judgments of the Supreme Court in Dhannalal v. Kalawatibai, (2002) 6 SCC 60 and in Uday Shankar Upadhyay vs. Naveen Maheshwari, (2010) 1 SCC 503, wherein it was held that judicial notice can be taken of the fact that upper floors are generally not commercially viable and consumers and patrons of the market are reluctant to walk into the same and more prone to walk into a shop on the ground floor.
Delhi High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - M P Arora - Full Document

Haji Malik Abdul Rehman (Sr. Citizen) vs Sh. Mahesh Kumar on 28 March, 2022

Counsel for the petitioner has filed the written arguments alongwith judgments titled as 'Sunder Singh Talwar Vs. Kamal Chand Dugar', 2018 (3) CLJ 105 Delhi, 'Kanaklata Das & Ors. Vs. Naba Kumar Das & Ors.', (2018) SCCR Page No. 247, CIS No. E-600/18 Haji Malik Abdul Rehman Vs. Mahesh Kumar Page 11 of 24 SANTOSH Digitally signed by SANTOSH KUMAR KUMAR SINGH Date: 2022.03.28 SINGH 17:24:09 +0500 'Muddasani Venkata Narsaiah (Dead) through Legal Representatives Vs. Muddasani Sarojana', (2016) 12 SCC 288, 'Royal Nepal Airlines Corporation Vs. Shrishti Properties Pvt. Ltd.' bearing R.C. REV. No. 132/2011 decided on 02.11.2011, M/s A.K. Woolen Industries & Ors. Vs. Sh. Narain Gupta, bearing R.C. REV. No. 495/2017 decided on 31.10.2017, 'Balwant Singh @ Bant Singh & Anr. Vs. Sudarshan Kumar & Anr.' bearing Civil Appeal No. 231-232 of 2021 decided on 27.01.2021, 'Hameeda Shahzad Vs. Shahjahan Khatoon & Ors.' bearing R.C. REV. No. 662/2015 decided on 31.01.2017, 'Dhannalal Vs. Kalawatibai & Ors.', IV (2002) SLT 250.
Delhi District Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next