Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.76 seconds)

Pradeep Kumar Gupta vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary ( Higher ... on 31 August, 2022

25. In the first place, there is found no post identified or reserved for persons with locomotor disablity, before issuance of the advertisement inviting application for the post of Library Peon at the Government Inter College, Deoband, Saharanpur. Second, the petitioner was more than 40 years of age on the date of first application on 2006. In absence of reservation for person with locomotor disability, the petitioner could not have claimed benefit of relaxation of age treating himself to be candidate belonging to the reserved category. That occasion would have arisen only if the enabling reservation had been first provided for. Though necessary, clearly, that was not done. Third, at present, no relief can be granted in the nature of employment for reason of passage of time as also for reason of the enabling order passed by the District Magistrate dated 30.11.2019 was withdrawn in toto. Besides no challenge thereto, that action had been practically endorsed by the Court in its earlier order dated 20.02.2020 passed in Writ ? A No. 1975 of 2020 (Ashok Kumar Sharma Vs. State of U.P. & 3 Ors.). Also, for that reason, no further enquiry is to be made at this belated stage.
Allahabad High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - S D Singh - Full Document

Ashok Kumar Sharma vs State Of U P And 3 Others on 31 January, 2020

5- It appears that belatedly, the petitioner filed Writ-A No.8086 of 2014 (Ashok Kumar Sharma v. State of U.P. and 2 others), whereby, he raised his grievance that financial approval to him is not being granted by the authorities. On his contention and without calling for a counter affidavit, the aforesaid Writ-A8086 of 2014 was disposed of by this Court by order dated 12.2.2014 as under :
Allahabad High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - S P Kesarwani - Full Document
1