Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.85 seconds)

Anjali Kukar vs M.M Lal Chhabra on 21 December, 2015

25 (I). She did not oppose the sudden appearance of the advocate Shri Pardeep Bedi from the girl's (complainant therein) side, for contesting the anticipatory bail case. He had no locus standi in the matter as it was case of "State Vs. Manish Chhabra and Others", and nobody from the girl's (complainant therein) side could appear and oppose the application for anticipatory bail; it was only the Public Prosecutor who could be heard in the matter by the Hon'ble Court. The complainant rather emphatically countered the deponent by saying that she cannot oppose him because in similar cases, she herself had been appearing in courts on behalf of girls.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 10 - A Chaudhry - Full Document

Satish Chhabra vs State Of Uttarakhand & Others on 22 May, 2015

6. As an interim measure, it is provided that till the next date of listing further proceedings of Criminal Case No.258 of 2015 (State Vs. Satish Chhabra and others), arising out of F.I.R. No.374/2010, under Sections 323/504/506/427 of I.P.C., at Police Station Rudrapur, District - Udham Singh Nagar, pending in the Court of 2 Chief Judicial Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar shall remain stayed.
Uttarakhand High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - S Dhulia - Full Document
1