Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.84 seconds)
Documents citing Shri S.P. Naik vs The Board Of Trustees, Mormugao Port ... on 22 February, 1999

G.Balasundaram ... Review vs The Secretary on 24 September, 2019

In S.P.Naik v. Board of Trustees, Mormugao Port Trust, Goa, reported in (1999) 3 MHLJ 351, a Hon'ble Division Bench of the Bombay High Court, while considering a challenge to the penalty of withholding of two annual increments for two years without cumulative effect and to the finding of the disciplinary authority, relating to the period of suspension, treating the same as non-duty, at para 9 of the said judgment held as follows :
Madras High Court Cites 31 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Challa Obulesu vs Board Of on 6 April, 2026

4. Learned counsel further contended that when the minor punishment is imposed, the respondents ought to have considered the case of the petitioner for regularization of suspension period under Rule 54(B) of Fundamental Rules treating the suspension period as on duty. But surprisingly the respondents have rejected the case treating the suspension period as not on duty. It is contrary to the observations made by the High Court of Bombay (Goa Bench) in S.P.Naik vs. Board of Trustees, Mormugao Port Trust, Goa and another1 wherein the Court has observed that if any minor penalty is awarded the suspension should be considered in terms of F.R.54(B) and the employee should be paid full pay and allowances for the period of suspension by passing a suitable order. By following the above said observation, the coordinate Bench of this Court has also disposed of the W.P.No.18893 of 2021 by extending the same benefit treating the suspension period as on duty. Accordingly, the petitioner is also entitled to consider his case for regularization of suspension period as per F.R.54(B).
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - D Ramesh - Full Document

Anil S/O Namdeorao Wankhede vs State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Principal ... on 28 November, 2023

2. In the aforesaid backdrop, it is claimed that the suspension period ought to have been treated as on duty period and entitled to all the benefits. Support is sought to be taken from the judgments including the judgment of this Court in the matter of S.P. Naik vs. Board of Trustees, Mormugao Port Trust reported in 1999(3) Mh.L.J. 351.
Bombay High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - A S Chandurkar - Full Document
1