Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.29 seconds)
Documents citing Smt. Monorama Devi And Ors. vs Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. And Anr. on 27 March, 2002

Basuri Shaw And Anr. vs New India Assurance Co. Ltd. And Ors. on 13 November, 2006

In this perspective the decision of this Court in the case of Monorama Devi (supra) can not be read to have laid down a principle of law that under Section 166 only the heirs as specified in the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 will be entitled to maintain a claim petition or such of the heirs as are entitled to succeed to the estate of the deceased as per the said Act would be entitled to receive the compensation.
Calcutta High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

P.N.Unni vs Baby John on 15 February, 2008

Ramanbhai Prabhabhai, 1987 ACJ 561 (SC). With great respect, we are of the view that the above conclusion is based on a misappreciation of the decision of the Supreme Court. A Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court in the decision reported in Monorama Devi v. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., 2003 ACJ 278 examined the question as to whether the father who is a class II heir is entitled to compensation along with widow and mother of the deceased who are class I heirs and held that the father who is a class II heir will not be entitled to claim compensation.
Kerala High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 6 - Harun-Ul-Rashid - Full Document

P.N.Unni vs Baby John on 15 February, 2008

Ramanbhai Prabhabhai, 1987 ACJ 561 (SC). With great respect, we are of the view that the above conclusion is based on a misappreciation of the decision of the Supreme Court. A Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court in the decision reported in Monorama Devi v. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., 2003 ACJ 278 examined the question as to whether the father who is a class II heir is entitled to compensation along with widow and mother of the deceased who are class I heirs and held that the father who is a class II heir will not be entitled to claim compensation.
Kerala High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Harun-Ul-Rashid - Full Document

National Insurance Company Ltd. vs Manorama Devi on 5 February, 2026

"for setting aside the judgment dated 25.06.2022 passed by the learned Additional District Sessions Judge-XIII-cum-M.A.C. Tribunal, Patna in Claim Case No. 377/2012, C.I.S. No. 2516/14, Manorama Devi & others versus National Insurance Company Limited & Others arising out of death of Nitish Kumar, claimaints are wife and father respectively, whereby and where under learned Tribunal has allowed the claim petition of the appellant and directed the opposite party National Insurance Patna High Court MA No.58 of 2023(6) dt.05-02-2026 2/4 Company Ltd. To pay total comopensation of Rs.9,66,800/- (Nine Lakhs Sixty Six Thousand Eight Hundred Only) after deducting the amount paid Rs.50,000/- as NFL, the remaining total amount is Rs.9,16,800/- to be paid to both the claimants as 50-50 percent i.e. 4,58,400/- to each claimant with simple interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of filing of the claim case i.e. 19.12.2012."
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - R Roy - Full Document
1