Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.93 seconds)
Documents citing Kimneo Haokip Hangshing vs Kenn Raikhan And 6 Ors on 1 September, 2022

& Ps Andro vs Shri Lourembam Sanjoy Singh on 13 October, 2023

(vi) Order dated 23.5.2023 passed in MC (EP) No.25/22 (Lorho S.Pfoze v. Houlim Shokhopao Mate @ Benjamin) (vii) Oder dated 5.7.2023 passed in MC (EP) No.66 of 2022 (Kimneo Haokip Hangshing v. Kenn Raikhan and others) 11 (viii) Order dated 12.9.2023 passed in MC (EP) No.7 of 2023 (Sorokhaibam Rajen Singh v. Pukhrambam Sumati Devi) [20] This Court considered the rival submissions and also perused the materials available on record.
Manipur High Court Cites 39 - Cited by 0 - M V Muralidaran - Full Document

Page No.# 1/7 vs Moon Swarnakar on 2 June, 2025

Shakuntala Devi Mishra & Ors., (2005) 13 SCC 687, (2) Srihari Hanumandas Totala v. Hemant Vithal Kamat & Ors., (2021) 9 SCC 99 , (3) Church of Christ Charitable Trust and Educational Charitable Society v. Ponniamman Education Trust, (2012) 8 SCC 706, (4) Dahiben v. Arvindbhai Kalyanji Bhanusali, (2020) 7 SCC 366, (5) Sopan Sukhdeo Sable & Ors. v. Assistant Charity Commissioner & Ors., (2004) 3 SCC 137, (6) Edelco Housing and Industries Ltd. v. Ashok Vidyarthi & Ors., 2023 SCC OnLine SC 1612 , (7) Madiraju Venkata Ramana Raju v. Peddireddigari Ramachandra Reddy, (2018) 14 SCC 1, (8) Ponnala Lakshmiah v. Kommuri Pratap Reddy & Ors., (2012) 7 SCC 788 , (9) Kimneo Haokip Hangshing v. Kenn Raikhan & Ors., 2024 SCC OnLine SC 2548 , and (10) Karim Uddin Barbhuiya v. Aminul Haque Laskar, 2024 SCC OnLine SC 509.
Gauhati High Court Cites 105 - Cited by 0 - K R Surana - Full Document

Shri. Anil Umrao Gote @ Anil Anna Gote vs The Election Commission Of India ... on 2 April, 2026

In the case of Kimneo Haokip Hangshing Vs. Kenn Raikhan and Ors. (supra), the election petition was filed on the ground of non- disclosure of assets in the nomination papers and allegations that the candidate had engaged in corrupt practices. Application under Order VII ( 39 ) Appln-92-2025 Rule 11 of CPC read with 86 of the Act came to be filed. The same was dismissed. In the challenge to the dismissal order, the court considered compliance of Section 94-A of form of affidavit, the Hon'ble Apex Court held that what is mandatory in such cases is that there should be substantial compliance. If substantial compliance in terms of furnishing all that is required under law has been given, the petition cannot be summarily dismissed.
Bombay High Court Cites 39 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shri. Anupbhaiyya Omprakash Agrawal vs Shri. Anil Umrao Gote @ Anil Anna Gote on 2 April, 2026

In the case of Kimneo Haokip Hangshing Vs. Kenn Raikhan and Ors. (supra), the election petition was filed on the ground of non- disclosure of assets in the nomination papers and allegations that the candidate had engaged in corrupt practices. Application under Order VII ( 39 ) Appln-92-2025 Rule 11 of CPC read with 86 of the Act came to be filed. The same was dismissed. In the challenge to the dismissal order, the court considered compliance of Section 94-A of form of affidavit, the Hon'ble Apex Court held that what is mandatory in such cases is that there should be substantial compliance. If substantial compliance in terms of furnishing all that is required under law has been given, the petition cannot be summarily dismissed.
Bombay High Court Cites 39 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next