Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 172 (2.15 seconds)
Documents citing P.S. Somanathan & Ors vs District Insurance Officers & Anr on 17 February, 2011

United India Insurance Company Ltd. ... vs Mrs. Shobha Amarsingh Rajput And Ors on 19 October, 2016

79. Moreover, though in the case of P.S. Somnathan Vs. District Insurance Officer (supra) and in the case of Amrit Bhanushali Vs. 51/67 FA-738-15-Group.doc ::: Uploaded on - 20/10/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 21/10/2016 00:55:20 ::: National Insurance Co. (supra), the two-Judges Bench of the Hon'ble Apex Court was dealing with a situation wherein parents alone were the claimants on account of death of unmarried son, in the later decision, the cases of Susamma Thomas (supra) and Trilok Chandra (supra) were neither referred, nor discussed and in the former decision, though these cases were referred, there is no discussion as to why the view taken in these two cases should be distinguished.
Bombay High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 7 - Full Document

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.Through ... vs Shri. Nagindas Gopalji Rachh And Ors on 19 October, 2016

79. Moreover, though in the case of P.S. Somnathan Vs. District Insurance Officer (supra) and in the case of Amrit Bhanushali Vs. 51/67 FA-738-15-Group.doc ::: Uploaded on - 20/10/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 21/10/2016 00:55:24 ::: National Insurance Co. (supra), the two-Judges Bench of the Hon'ble Apex Court was dealing with a situation wherein parents alone were the claimants on account of death of unmarried son, in the later decision, the cases of Susamma Thomas (supra) and Trilok Chandra (supra) were neither referred, nor discussed and in the former decision, though these cases were referred, there is no discussion as to why the view taken in these two cases should be distinguished.
Bombay High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.Through ... vs Shri. Haresh Shantilal Avlani And Ors on 19 October, 2016

79. Moreover, though in the case of P.S. Somnathan Vs. District Insurance Officer (supra) and in the case of Amrit Bhanushali Vs. 51/67 FA-738-15-Group.doc ::: Uploaded on - 20/10/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 21/10/2016 00:55:28 ::: National Insurance Co. (supra), the two-Judges Bench of the Hon'ble Apex Court was dealing with a situation wherein parents alone were the claimants on account of death of unmarried son, in the later decision, the cases of Susamma Thomas (supra) and Trilok Chandra (supra) were neither referred, nor discussed and in the former decision, though these cases were referred, there is no discussion as to why the view taken in these two cases should be distinguished.
Bombay High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Kaila Devi & Ors. on 18 March, 2015

In that case, the learned counsel for the Appellant had relied on the following judgments (i) Smt. Sarla Verma & Ors. v. Delhi Transport Corporation & Anr., 2009 (6) SCC 121; (ii) Mohd. Ameeruddin v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd., 2010 (12) SCALE 155; (iii) P.S. Somanathan v. District Insurance Officer, I (2011) ACC 659 (SC): (iv) Bilkish v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr., 2008 (4) SCALE 25; (v) National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Azad Singh & Ors., 2010 ACJ 2384 (SC); (vi) Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Deo Patodi & Ors., 2009 ACJ 2359 (SC), and (vii) Divisional Manager, New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. T. Chelladurai & Ors., 2010 ACJ 382 (SC).
Delhi High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 12 - G P Mittal - Full Document

The Divisional Controller Nwkrtc vs Shri Malappa S/O Muttappa Karigar on 10 February, 2012

8. As could be seen from the dictum In the case of P.SSOMANATHAN & OTHERS VS. DISTRICT INSURANCE OFFICER & ANOTHER, the Apex Court dealing with a case of bachelor held that the age of the victim should be taken into consideration and not the age of parents. Besides, it is also held that merely because the victim is a bachelor, 50% of his monthly earnings cannot be deducted, it should be 1/31(1 only.
Karnataka High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - J Rahim - Full Document

Mst. Samina W/O Late Tahir ... Wife vs Dost Mohammad S/O Ishak Mohammad on 24 January, 2015

In view of judgments rendered in Mohd. Hasnain & Ors. Vs. Jayram Meena & Ors. and in "Cholamandalam M.S. General Insurance Company Vs. Issak Khan & Ors." (Both decided by Hon'ble High Court of Delhi on 24.03.2014 and 26.03.2014 respectively) and of Hon'ble Apex Court in P.S. Somanathan & Ors. Vs. District Insurance Office & Anr. (2011 ACJ 737), while assessing the dependency, the age of deceased is to be taken for selecting MAC No. 103/13 Mst.
Delhi District Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Rekha W/O Late Sh. Dhani Lal ...Wife vs Abbas Khan S/O Mr. Amin Khan on 4 February, 2015

In view of judgments rendered in Mohd. Hasnain & Ors. Vs. Jayram Meena & Ors. and in "Cholamandalam M.S. General Insurance Company Vs. Issak Khan & Ors." (Both decided by Hon'ble High Court of Delhi on 24.03.2014 and 26.03.2014 respectively) and of Hon'ble Apex Court in P.S. Somanathan & Ors. Vs. District Insurance Office & Anr. (2011 ACJ 737), while assessing the dependency, the age of deceased is to be taken for selecting the correct multiplier.
Delhi District Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next