Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.22 seconds)

In Re vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi on 23 September, 2022

39. I have gone through the judgments relied by the ld. Counsel for the appellant in Manju Chaurasia (supra), Nirmala Jain (supra); and Syed Muzaffar Ali (supra). The said judgments are distinguishable in the present facts and circumstances because the application for regularization of the unauthorized construction raised by the appellant has already been rejected and action as per law taken after giving show cause notice.
Delhi District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Nirmala Jain vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi And Anr. ... on 4 August, 2006

12. The above factual narrative would show that the demolition orders issued in respect of the petitioners have in effect been interfered with; the MCD cannot take any action on account of the undertaking furnished by the petitioners which in consonance with the judgment of this Court in Manju Chourasia's case. The undertaking recorded by the tribunal and its orders dated 17.8.2004 have become final. In these circumstances there is some force in the submission that the sealing orders are virtually meaningless. This is more so because the premises are located in a colony awaiting regularization. It is undisputed that in the same building, several flat owners are residing.
Delhi High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - S R Bhat - Full Document
1