Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.54 seconds)
Documents citing State Of Maharashtra And Anr. vs Rajendra Narayanrao Gaikwad on 20 July, 2007

State Of Maha vs Dashrath Tatya Bansode on 29 January, 2018

(i) If the possession of the land under acquisition is taken under Section 16 of the said Act i.e. after an award is made by the Collector under Section 11 therein, the interest would be payable under Section 34 from the date of passing of the award and we are in agreement with such a view expressed by the Division Bench of this Court (S/Shri N. V. Dabholkar and M. G. Gaikwad, JJ.) in the case of State of Maharashtra and Anr. v. Rajendra Narayanrao Gaikwad, reported in (2008) 1 Bom CR 839.
Bombay High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - M S Sonak - Full Document

State Of Maha vs Dagdu Shankar Bansode Died Lrs & Ors on 29 January, 2018

(i) If the possession of the land under acquisition is taken under Section 16 of the said Act i.e. after an award is made by the Collector under Section 11 therein, the interest would be payable under Section 34 from the date of passing of the award and we are in agreement with such a view expressed by the Division Bench of this Court (S/Shri N. V. Dabholkar and M. G. Gaikwad, JJ.) in the case of State of Maharashtra and Anr. v. Rajendra Narayanrao Gaikwad, reported in (2008) 1 Bom CR 839.
Bombay High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - M S Sonak - Full Document

State Of Maha vs Pandurang Kedari Raut on 29 January, 2018

(i) If the possession of the land under acquisition is taken under Section 16 of the said Act i.e. after an award is made by the Collector under Section 11 therein, the interest would be payable under Section 34 from the date of passing of the award and we are in agreement with such a view expressed by the Division Bench of this Court (S/Shri N. V. Dabholkar and M. G. Gaikwad, JJ.) in the case of State of Maharashtra and Anr. v. Rajendra Narayanrao Gaikwad, reported in (2008) 1 Bom CR 839.
Bombay High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - M S Sonak - Full Document

State Of Maha vs Dadarao Vaijinath Agarkar on 29 January, 2018

(i) If the possession of the land under acquisition is taken under Section 16 of the said Act i.e. after an award is made by the Collector under Section 11 therein, the interest would be payable under Section 34 from the date of passing of the award and we are in agreement with such a view expressed by the Division Bench of this Court (S/Shri N. V. Dabholkar and M. G. Gaikwad, JJ.) in the case of State of Maharashtra and Anr. v. Rajendra Narayanrao Gaikwad, reported in (2008) 1 Bom CR 839.
Bombay High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - M S Sonak - Full Document

State Of Maha vs Shankar Sonaji Bansode on 29 January, 2018

(i) If the possession of the land under acquisition is taken under Section 16 of the said Act i.e. after an award is made by the Collector under Section 11 therein, the interest would be payable under Section 34 from the date of passing of the award and we are in agreement with such a view expressed by the Division Bench of this Court (S/Shri N. V. Dabholkar and M. G. Gaikwad, JJ.) in the case of State of Maharashtra and Anr. v. Rajendra Narayanrao Gaikwad, reported in (2008) 1 Bom CR 839.
Bombay High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - M S Sonak - Full Document

State Of Maha vs Sahadev Rangnath Raut on 29 January, 2018

(i) If the possession of the land under acquisition is taken under Section 16 of the said Act i.e. after an award is made by the Collector under Section 11 therein, the interest would be payable under Section 34 from the date of passing of the award and we are in agreement with such a view expressed by the Division Bench of this Court (S/Shri N. V. Dabholkar and M. G. Gaikwad, JJ.) in the case of State of Maharashtra and Anr. v. Rajendra Narayanrao Gaikwad, reported in (2008) 1 Bom CR 839.
Bombay High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - M S Sonak - Full Document
1