Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.31 seconds)

Indra Narain Misra vs State Of U.P.Thorugh Its Secy. Revenue ... on 16 August, 2023

Considering the above quoted provision as also taking note of judgment passed in the case of Daswant Ram (Supra) and Consolidation No.5237 of 2017 (Rajendra Prasad Dixit & Others vs. State of U.P. & Others); reported in 2018 (139) RD 322, it is apparent that the final order, if any, passed prior to issuance of notice under Section 6 of the Act of 1953 which has attained finality has been protected. However, the petitioner has not assailed any order before this Court based upon sub-section 2 of Section 6 of the Act of 1953, as such, this Court is not inclined to entertain the present petition for the relief No.6. However, it is expected from the authority concerned that the order passed prior of issuance of notification would be considered in the light of sub-section 2 of Section 6 of the Act of 1953.
Allahabad High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - S Lavania - Full Document

Ram Dhari Public School vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others on 17 October, 2023

7. Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case as well as if there is no other legal impediment available, the respondent no.3 is hereby directed to consider and decide application dated 27.01.2023 preferred by petitioner under Section 38 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 in the light of judgment rendered by co-ordinate Bench of this Court in case of Devendra Dutt Shukla (supra) and Rajendra Prasad Dixit & others (supra), as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of nine months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to all the parties.
Allahabad High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - S Srivastava - Full Document

Manorama Dixit vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 24 August, 2020

The petitioner claims that she is daughter-in-law of the plaintiffs of Original Suit No.604 of 1980 (Rajendra Prasad Dixit Vs. State of U.P.). The said suit was decreed in favour of the plaintiffs and against the State-authorities. The plaintiff thereafter filed an Execution Case No.2 of 2011 and pursuant thereto possession was delivered to the plaintiffs. Now, the grievance has been raised by the daughter-in-law of the plaintiffs that the Police authorities are again interfering with the land of the plaintiffs in spite the same having been settled by a decree of the Court of competent jurisdiction.
Allahabad High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1