Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 266 (5.76 seconds)
Documents citing High Court Of Delhi vs Devina Sharma on 14 March, 2022

K.Indulekha vs The Chairman on 31 July, 2023

18. The petitioner / Sathiyamoorthy seeks relaxation of age by excluding the Covid period. Even though Sathiyamoorthy has sufficient years of practice as on the date of notification, his date of birth was 10.12.1979, thereby he crossed the maximum upper age provided in the notification, as the maximum upper age limit prescribed for SC/ST in terms of 4(A) was 42 years. Sathiyamoorthy stated that the age relaxation fixed for reserved candidates should be different and it cannot be applied uniformly along with other communal categories. Admittedly, Rules have not been questioned and in the absence of express provision to relax the rules, as pointed out by the learned Standing Counsel for the Madras High Court, no leniency can be shown to petitioner / Sathiyamoorthy. Moreover, the judgment of the Apex Court in High Court of Delhi vs Devina Sharma (supra) may not be applicable to the facts of this case, because pursuant to the concession given by the Government before the Supreme Court, two years' relaxation have been given and secondly, outer age limit has been 26/36 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.17456, 18843, 19151 and 19652 of 2023 increased by two years, namely, 40 to 42 years by amending the Rules as stated supra.
Madras High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - S Vaidyanathan - Full Document

Jiji Mathew vs Education on 28 March, 2024

| In the present case, it is noticed that the recruitment rules were, " initially notified in the year 2019 and subsequently same was amended and notified on 28.06.2023. In the. meantime, it is not in dispute that various © posts. of GTT and -other posts of education department were declared "deemed abolished". In this regard, it is apt to mention that the applicants have annexed the copies of information supplied to one of the resident of hae aig 39 0.A. 351/00057/2024 South Andaman namely Abdul Arish by the respondents under RTI Act vide letter dated 03.01 2024 atid details of revival of the said post by the Ministry of Education vide letter dated 19.09.2023 as well letter dated 13.10.2023 (Annexure A/14 collectively. refer). Thereafter, on finalization of: the | Recruitment Rules and on due approval of revival of various posts of GTT, the respondents have issued vacancy notice to fill up the vacancies for the post of GTT. Therefore, the parity which has been sought by the applicant in respect to the judgment passed by the Hon'ble-Apex Court in Devina case (supra) in. our considered view does not come to their aid.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Kolkata Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Naveen Malik vs Commissioner Of Police on 7 March, 2023

In the ultimate analysis, a coordinate Bench of this Court observed that the advertisement which was intended to be issued in the year 2019 has to be postponed owing to the Covid-19 pandemic and, accordingly, it was decided to consider the case as a special case and further taking into consideration the fact that the vacancies are to be filled up every year and the same having not been followed in that case, the coordinate Bench by referring the judgment of the Hon‟ble Supreme Corut in the case of High Court of Delhi vs. Devina Sharma (Civil Appeal No.216 of 2022, arising out of SLP (C) No.4452 of 2022) concluded that the case of the Petitioner deserves to be considered sympathetically in the facts and circumstances of the case and, accordingly, allowed the writ petition by granting opportunity to the Petitioner as a one-time measure.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 50 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Garima Saklani vs Commissioner Of Police on 7 March, 2023

In the ultimate analysis, a coordinate Bench of this Court observed that the advertisement which was intended to be issued in the year 2019 has to be postponed owing to the Covid-19 pandemic and, accordingly, it was decided to consider the case as a special case and further taking into consideration the fact that the vacancies are to be filled up every year and the same having not been followed in that case, the coordinate Bench by referring the judgment of the Hon‟ble Supreme Corut in the case of High Court of Delhi vs. Devina Sharma (Civil Appeal No.216 of 2022, arising out of SLP (C) No.4452 of 2022) concluded that the case of the Petitioner deserves to be considered sympathetically in the facts and circumstances of the case and, accordingly, allowed the writ petition by granting opportunity to the Petitioner as a one-time measure.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 48 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Deepak Sharma vs Delhi Police on 7 March, 2023

In the ultimate analysis, a coordinate Bench of this Court observed that the advertisement which was intended to be issued in the year 2019 has to be postponed owing to the Covid-19 pandemic and, accordingly, it was decided to consider the case as a special case and further taking into consideration the fact that the vacancies are to be filled up every year and the same having not been followed in that case, the coordinate Bench by referring the judgment of the Hon‟ble Supreme Corut in the case of High Court of Delhi vs. Devina Sharma (Civil Appeal No.216 of 2022, arising out of SLP (C) No.4452 of 2022) concluded that the case of the Petitioner deserves to be considered sympathetically in the facts and circumstances of the case and, accordingly, allowed the writ petition by granting opportunity to the Petitioner as a one-time measure.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 50 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ravinder vs Commissioner Of Police on 7 March, 2023

In the ultimate analysis, a coordinate Bench of this Court observed that the advertisement which was intended to be issued in the year 2019 has to be postponed owing to the Covid-19 pandemic and, accordingly, it was decided to consider the case as a special case and further taking into consideration the fact that the vacancies are to be filled up every year and the same having not been followed in that case, the coordinate Bench by referring the judgment of the Hon‟ble Supreme Corut in the case of High Court of Delhi vs. Devina Sharma (Civil Appeal No.216 of 2022, arising out of SLP (C) No.4452 of 2022) concluded that the case of the Petitioner deserves to be considered sympathetically in the facts and circumstances of the case and, accordingly, allowed the writ petition by granting opportunity to the Petitioner as a one-time measure.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 50 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Jitender vs Delhi Police on 7 March, 2023

In the ultimate analysis, a coordinate Bench of this Court observed that the advertisement which was intended to be issued in the year 2019 has to be postponed owing to the Covid-19 pandemic and, accordingly, it was decided to consider the case as a special case and further taking into consideration the fact that the vacancies are to be filled up every year and the same having not been followed in that case, the coordinate Bench by referring the judgment of the Hon‟ble Supreme Corut in the case of High Court of Delhi vs. Devina Sharma (Civil Appeal No.216 of 2022, arising out of SLP (C) No.4452 of 2022) concluded that the case of the Petitioner deserves to be considered sympathetically in the facts and circumstances of the case and, accordingly, allowed the writ petition by granting opportunity to the Petitioner as a one-time measure.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 50 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Vishal Singh vs Commissioner Of Police on 7 March, 2023

In the ultimate analysis, a coordinate Bench of this Court observed that the advertisement which was intended to be issued in the year 2019 has to be postponed owing to the Covid-19 pandemic and, accordingly, it was decided to consider the case as a special case and further taking into consideration the fact that the vacancies are to be filled up every year and the same having not been followed in that case, the coordinate Bench by referring the judgment of the Hon‟ble Supreme Corut in the case of High Court of Delhi vs. Devina Sharma (Civil Appeal No.216 of 2022, arising out of SLP (C) No.4452 of 2022) concluded that the case of the Petitioner deserves to be considered sympathetically in the facts and circumstances of the case and, accordingly, allowed the writ petition by granting opportunity to the Petitioner as a one-time measure.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 50 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sandeep vs Commissioner Of Police on 7 March, 2023

In the ultimate analysis, a coordinate Bench of this Court observed that the advertisement which was intended to be issued in the year 2019 has to be postponed owing to the Covid-19 pandemic and, accordingly, it was decided to consider the case as a special case and further taking into consideration the fact that the vacancies are to be filled up every year and the same having not been followed in that case, the coordinate Bench by referring the judgment of the Hon‟ble Supreme Corut in the case of High Court of Delhi vs. Devina Sharma (Civil Appeal No.216 of 2022, arising out of SLP (C) No.4452 of 2022) concluded that the case of the Petitioner deserves to be considered sympathetically in the facts and circumstances of the case and, accordingly, allowed the writ petition by granting opportunity to the Petitioner as a one-time measure.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 50 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next