Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (1.10 seconds)
Documents citing Pradeep Kumar Singh vs State Of U.P. And Others on 2 April, 2010

Siyaram Kurre vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 28 June, 2022

Relying on the judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in matter of Pradeep Singh Vs. State of U.P., 2010 (2) SCC 114, it is submitted that in case of concealment of fact by a party the relief claimed can be denied by the court. It is further submitted that the Collector had constituted inquiry committee of officers below the rank of the persons accused, especially the Competent Authority who held the rank of Addl. Collector.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 48 - Cited by 0 - R C Samant - Full Document

Smt. Neelima Belsaria vs Bastar Railway Private Limited on 28 June, 2022

Relying on the judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in matter of Pradeep Singh Vs. State of U.P., 2010 (2) SCC 114, it is submitted that in case of concealment of fact by a party the relief claimed can be denied by the court. It is further submitted that the Collector had constituted inquiry committee of officers below the rank of the persons accused, especially the Competent Authority who held the rank of Addl. Collector.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 48 - Cited by 0 - R C Samant - Full Document

Bali Nagwanshi vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 28 June, 2022

Relying on the judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in matter of Pradeep Singh Vs. State of U.P., 2010 (2) SCC 114, it is submitted that in case of concealment of fact by a party the relief claimed can be denied by the court. It is further submitted that the Collector had constituted inquiry committee of officers below the rank of the persons accused, especially the Competent Authority who held the rank of Addl. Collector.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 48 - Cited by 0 - R C Samant - Full Document

Suresh B. Matali vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 28 June, 2022

Relying on the judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in matter of Pradeep Singh Vs. State of U.P., 2010 (2) SCC 114, it is submitted that in case of concealment of fact by a party the relief claimed can be denied by the court. It is further submitted that the Collector had constituted inquiry committee of officers below the rank of the persons accused, especially the Competent Authority who held the rank of Addl. Collector.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 48 - Cited by 0 - R C Samant - Full Document

Hira Lal Nayak vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 28 June, 2022

Relying on the judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in matter of Pradeep Singh Vs. State of U.P., 2010 (2) SCC 114, it is submitted that in case of concealment of fact by a party the relief claimed can be denied by the court. It is further submitted that the Collector had constituted inquiry committee of officers below the rank of the persons accused, especially the Competent Authority who held the rank of Addl. Collector.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 48 - Cited by 0 - R C Samant - Full Document

Smt. Neelima Belsaria vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 28 June, 2022

Relying on the judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in matter of Pradeep Singh Vs. State of U.P., 2010 (2) SCC 114, it is submitted that in case of concealment of fact by a party the relief claimed can be denied by the court. It is further submitted that the Collector had constituted inquiry committee of officers below the rank of the persons accused, especially the Competent Authority who held the rank of Addl. Collector.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 48 - Cited by 0 - R C Samant - Full Document

Koushal Kumar Thakur vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 28 June, 2022

Relying on the judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in matter of Pradeep Singh Vs. State of U.P., 2010 (2) SCC 114, it is submitted that in case of concealment of fact by a party the relief claimed can be denied by the court. It is further submitted that the Collector had constituted inquiry committee of officers below the rank of the persons accused, especially the Competent Authority who held the rank of Addl. Collector.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 48 - Cited by 0 - R C Samant - Full Document

Bali Nagwanshi vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 28 June, 2022

Relying on the judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in matter of Pradeep Singh Vs. State of U.P., 2010 (2) SCC 114, it is submitted that in case of concealment of fact by a party the relief claimed can be denied by the court. It is further submitted that the Collector had constituted inquiry committee of officers below the rank of the persons accused, especially the Competent Authority who held the rank of Addl. Collector.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 48 - Cited by 0 - R C Samant - Full Document
1