Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.24 seconds)
Documents citing Vijay Pal @ Goldy vs State Of Haryana And Others on 20 March, 2019

Vijay Pal @ Goldy vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 4 July, 2019

Learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the authority of Supreme Court in Krishan Lal vs. State of Rajasthan and another, 2013 AIR (SC) 411, which was relied upon by this Court while allowing the prayer in CWP No.1989 of 2019, decided on 20.3.2019 titled as Vijay Pal @ Goldy vs. State of Haryana and others, in which the petitioner was allowed parole under Section 3(1)(a) of Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1988, after quashing the order passed by the authorities vide which the parole was declined. In that case, father of the petitioner has died.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - K Singh - Full Document

Sameer Nain vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 14 November, 2019

7. It is pointed out by Mr. Rathee that in Vijay Pal @ Goldy' case, the petitioner was declared a hard core prisoner under Section 2 (aa) (i) of Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1988. Therefore, he was released on armed escort for three days. As far as danger of absconding is concerned, that may not be sufficient reason to decline parole as the conditions can be placed on the petitioner, in 5 of 7 ::: Downloaded on - 13-01-2020 04:33:40 ::: CWP No.26346 of 2019 (O&M) -6- case parole is granted, apart from giving adequate to heavy surety to the satisfaction of the District Magistrate concerned. The fact that the petitioner was released on parole or furlough for 8-9 times in the past is sufficient reason to suggest that the petitioner would not abscond. In case the petitioner misuses the concession of parole granted to him by this Court in this order, it is directed that he will never be released on parole/furlough during the remainder of his natural life. This is a strong and potent guard against any misuse of concession or jumping parole by the petitioner. He will be aware of the terrible consequences if he runs away and is arrested.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - R N Raina - Full Document

Joginder vs State Of Haryana And Others on 29 June, 2021

On notice of the petition, a written statement has been filed on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 3 stating therein that apart from the present case i.e F.I.R No. 429 dated 19.11.2014, there are two other cases pending against the present petitioner i.e F.I.R No. 430 dated 19.11.2014 under Section 302/343/120-B IPC and F.I.R No. 428 dated 18.11.2014 under Sections 107/147/148/186/188/120-B/121/121-A/122/123/224/225/332/ 353/342/307/436 IPC and Sections 25/54/59 of Arms Act. Reference has been made to decision dated 04.07.2019 passed by this Court in CWP No. 17637-2019 titled as Vijay Pal @ Goldy vs. State of Haryana and others, wherein in similar circumstances, the case of the petitioner was dismissed, keeping in view the fact that the sentence of the convict is for life imprisonment till natural death.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - R Bahri - Full Document
1