Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.64 seconds)
Documents citing Icici Lombard General Insurance ... vs Arti Devi @ Arti Kunwar And Ors on 10 May, 2022

Shiv Kumari Lr (S/C) vs Deepanshu Singh on 28 October, 2025

that one of the main objective that the act aims to achieve is to ensure expeditious help to accident victim and their families. The act provides compulsory insurance qua third party risk making the insurance company liable to reimburse the insured in case of any liability incurred by him towards third party, arising out of motor vehicle accident involving his vehicle. The act aims at providing compensation to the victim of the accident who have suffered injuries 'grievous or simple' or the loss of their loved ones to ensure that they are able to lead a decent life post accident. Though the compensation awarded to a victim of a accident under the MV Act cannot relegate the person to the same position as he was in, before the accident, yet the financial assistance provided to him in the form of compensation provides some ray of light to him and enables him to lead a decent life post accident. Therefore, it is important to ensure that the compensation to which a victim of an accident is held entitled in the judgment or an award passed by MACT Tribunal, is made available to him without any delay and the victim is not made to run from pillar to post to obtain the same and also does not have to wait for years and years to receive the compensation. Any delay in payment of compensation would amount to rendering the provisions of the MV Act meaningless. It also cannot be lost sight of that where the driver and the owner are the persons with weak financial background, the payment of the compensation to the victim would infact become impossible. 10.3 Recently, a similar issue was raised before the Hon'ble High Court of Allahabad in matter of "ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Vs. Arti Devi & Ors", First Appeal Shiv Kumari & Ors. vs. Deepanshu Singh & ors.
Delhi District Court Cites 32 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shankar Paswan (Lr) vs Rakesh on 24 January, 2026

11.11 In view of the foregoing discussion, the binding precedents of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and Section 150 sub- section 1 & 5 of the MV Act, 1988, Section 147(6) of the MV Act, 1988 and the judgment of Hon'ble High Court of Allahabad in ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Limited (supra), the principle of pay & recover would still be applicable to meet the ends of justice. Accordingly, the insurance company is held liable to pay compensation to the petitioners as a valid policy was effective on the date of the accident and shall also be entitled to recover the said amount from the insured as per contract between them. Hence, insurance company is directed to deposit the award amount in favour of the petitioners.
Delhi District Court Cites 42 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Barun Kumar Jha (Deceased) vs Rakhi on 9 February, 2026

28. Now, the question which arises for determination is as to which of the respondents is liable to pay the compensation amount. It is claim of R3 that R1 was not having valid DL at the time of accident and as such there is breach of insurance policy, therefore, R3 is not liable to compensate the petitioners. It is on record that R1 was charge sheet for offence under Section 3/181 M V Act. There is breach of insurance policy. However, as the offending vehicle was insured with R3 at the time of accident, R3 cannot be directly absolved from its liability. [See: ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Vs. Arti Devi 2025:AHC:14110,MANU/UP/0194/2025] As such, R3/Insurance Company is directed to pay the compensation in favour of petitioners. Issue No.2 is decided accordingly. The parties are directed to download the digital copy of judgment online.
Delhi District Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mohit vs Vishal on 11 February, 2026

10.12 In view of the foregoing discussion, the binding precedents of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and Section 150 sub- section 1 & 5 of the MV Act, 1988, Section 147(6) of the MV Act, 1988 and the judgment of Hon'ble High Court of Allahabad in ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Limited (supra), the principle of pay & recover would still be applicable to meet the ends of justice. Accordingly, the insurance company is held liable to pay compensation to the petitioners as a valid policy was effective on the date of the accident and shall also be entitled to recover the said amount from the insured as per contract between them. Hence, insurance company is directed to deposit the award amount in favour of the petitioners.
Delhi District Court Cites 36 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next