Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.65 seconds)

Sushil Ansal vs State Thr.Cbi on 5 March, 2014

In State of M.P. v. Sangram and Ors. AIR 2006 SC 48 a three-Judge Bench of this Court remanded the matter to the High Court for fresh disposal without going into the merits of the case, when it found that the High Court had reduced a sentence for an offence under Section 307 IPC from seven years rigorous imprisonment to the period already undergone (ten months and five days) by a short and cryptic judgment:
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 91 - Cited by 0 - T S Thakur - Full Document

State Of M.P vs Mohan & Ors on 30 July, 2013

13. This Court in State of M.P. v. Sangram and Others (AIR 2006 SC 48) took strong exception in the manner in which the High Court, while disposing of the criminal appeal, reduced the sentence without application of mind. That was also a case where the accused was charge-sheeted for offence punishable under Section 307 IPC. The trial Court imposed the sentence of seven years rigorous imprisonment, which was reduced by the High Court to one year, without stating any satisfactory reasons for reduction of sentence. This Court held as follows:
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 19 - K Radhakrishnan - Full Document

Sushil Ansal vs State Thr.Cbi on 5 March, 2014

In State of M.P. v. Sangram and Ors. AIR 2006 SC 48 a three-Judge Bench of this Court remanded the matter to the High Court for fresh disposal without going into the merits of the case, when it found that the High Court had reduced a sentence for an offence under Section 307 IPC from seven years rigorous imprisonment to the period already undergone (ten months and five days) by a short and cryptic judgment:
Supreme Court of India Cites 90 - Cited by 182 - T S Thakur - Full Document
1