Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.38 seconds)
Documents citing Kishan Pandey vs Bachha Shankar Mishra on 28 April, 2014

Partner Of vs Proprietrix Of on 26 November, 2021

30. Further learned counsel for complainant placed reliance and decision of Apex court in case between Kishan Rao Vs Shankar gouda reported in AIR 2018 SCC 3173 Supreme court of India wherein Apex court held that complainant proving issuance of cheque having signatures of accused failing to rebut presumption raised against him and no evidence lead by accused in support of his case. Acquittal of the accused by the High court in revisional jurisdiction on the ground of doubt in mind of curt with regard to existence of loan improper and accused liable to be convicted.
Bangalore District Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Partner Of vs Proprietrix Of on 26 November, 2021

30. Further learned counsel for complainant placed reliance and decision of Apex court in case between Kishan Rao Vs Shankar gouda reported in AIR 2018 SCC 3173 Supreme court of India wherein Apex court held that complainant proving issuance of cheque having signatures of accused failing to rebut presumption raised against him and no evidence lead by accused in support of his case. Acquittal of the accused by the High court in revisional jurisdiction on the ground of doubt in mind of curt with regard to existence of loan improper and accused liable to be convicted.
Bangalore District Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Partner Of vs Proprietrix Of on 26 November, 2021

30. Further learned counsel for complainant placed reliance and decision of Apex court in case between Kishan Rao Vs Shankar gouda reported in AIR 2018 SCC 3173 Supreme court of India wherein Apex court held that complainant proving issuance of cheque having signatures of accused failing to rebut presumption raised against him and no evidence lead by accused in support of his case. Acquittal of the accused by the High court in revisional jurisdiction on the ground of doubt in mind of curt with regard to existence of loan improper and accused liable to be convicted.
Bangalore District Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sri.Raghavendra.R vs Mr.Khaja Sab on 25 July, 2022

32. The learned counsel for the complainant has also relied upon a decision reported in AIR 2018 SC 3173 in between Kishan Rao Vs. Shankar gowda, wherein while dealing with the provisions of Section 138 and 139 of the N.I.Act, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that when the complainant proved the issuance of cheque for having signature of accused and when the accused has failed to rebut the presumption raised against him and when no evidence led by him in his support, then the accused is liable for conviction.
Bangalore District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1