4. The Learned Counsel for the petitioner further
submits that in V.Shashi Kala Vs. District Collector1,
where the candidature of the petitioner therein who
was a married daughter of the deceased employee
therein was rejected on similar grounds as in the
instant case, this Court has held that the petitioner
1 2019 (3) ALD 338 (DB)
3
SK,J
W.P.No.6504 of 2023
therein who was certified by the Revenue Department
to be dependent on her father is eligible to get
compassionate appointment and requested to allow
the Writ Petition.
He
further also placed reliance upon the decision of the Division
Bench of this Court in the case of Smt.V.Shashi Kala Vs. The
District Collector Anantapuram, Anantapuram District in
W.P.No.41931 of 2017 dated 05.06.2018 for the proposition that
the petitioner being the married daughter need not be residing
with the mother to be eligible for compassionate appointment.
5. Having regard to the fact that the case of the
petitioner falls under G.O.Ms.No.350, dt.30.07.1999, which
itself clarifies that when the married daughter is dependent
upon of the employee and is otherwise eligible for
compassionate appointment, her case should be
considered for appointment. Further, in a number of
decisions, this Court has held that compassionate
appointment should be given to the married daughter if
she is otherwise eligible in respect of qualification and
3
financial position. The decisions relied upon by the learned
counsel for the petitioner are: in the case of V. Shashi Kala
Vs. the District Collector, Ananthapuram and others in
W.P.No.41931 of 2017 dated 05.06.2018 and in the case of
the Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad and others Vs. K.
Padmaja in W.P.No.16242 of 2013 dated 20.06.2013.