Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (1.09 seconds)
Documents citing B.S.N.L., Jammu vs Teja Singh on 16 January, 2009

Dharam Veer vs Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited on 5 September, 2022

In this light of the matter, we are of the view that merely because the applicant was re-engaged pursuant to order dated 26.10.2005, and was continued to work and is being continued to be re-engaged in terms of Interim Order dated 19.05.2015 of this Tribunal cannot give rise to seek relief of regularisation as held by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the Hon'ble Apex Court in BSNL, Jammu Vs Teja Singh in Civil Appeal No.292/2009 decided on 16.1.2009, Post Master General, Kolkata Vs Tutu Das, 2007 (5) SCC 317 and Official Liquidator Vs Dayanand & ors ( 2008) 10 SCC 1.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Dharam Veer vs Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited on 31 May, 2016

6. The respondents have filed a counter affidavit submitting that the applicant had been re-instated in service and converted into a FTCL vide order dated 30.03.2007 by the respondents. He, however, could not be regularized on account of the bar imposed by the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Uma Devi's case (supra), Official Liquidator Vs. Dayanand [2008 (10) SCC 1] and B.S.N.L. Vs. Teja Singh.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Govind Pandit vs Ministry Of Education on 17 April, 2025

"In view of the said decision of the Constitution Bench, there cannot be any doubt whatsoever that the 1989 regularisation scheme having not been enforced in the 36 Item No.24 with item Nos. 25 and 26(C-5) O.A. No. 2196/2022 and batch case of the respondent, it did not come within the purview of the exception carved out by the Court in paragraph 53, of Umadevi as quoted above.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Dharam Veer vs Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited Through ... on 1 April, 2026

15. At the outset, it is required to be noted that the Tribunal has dismissed the Original Application primarily by placing reliance upon the judgments of the Hon‟ble Supreme Court in Uma Devi (supra), BSNL Jammu v. Teja Singh3, and Official Liquidator v. Dayanand & Others4 to hold that a casual or temporary employee does not possess any vested right to seek regularisation.
Delhi High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1