Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.29 seconds)

M/S.Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance vs Poolraj on 29 September, 2023

As rightly pointed out by the learned counsel appearing for the claimants, the Division Bench of this Court, in the Divisional Manager, the Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs. Ezhilarasi @ Maheswari and others (C.M.A.No.2265 of 2016 dated 22.03.2017) and in R.Rajan Vs. G.Rajkumar and another (C.M.A.No.1012 of 2017 dated 20.03.2017), have calculated the income tax by deducting the amount exempted under Section 80C of the Income Tax Act and also given statutory exemption for the first Rs.1,80,000/-. As already pointed out, as per Ex.P.12, the gross income of the deceased Venkata Subramanian is shown as Rs.4,01,749/- and the monthly income would come to Rs.33,479/- (Rs.4,01,749 / 12).
Madras High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S.Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance vs Poolraj on 29 September, 2023

As rightly pointed out by the learned counsel appearing for the claimants, the Division Bench of this Court, in the Divisional Manager, the Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs. Ezhilarasi @ Maheswari and others (C.M.A.No.2265 of 2016 dated 22.03.2017) and in R.Rajan Vs. G.Rajkumar and another (C.M.A.No.1012 of 2017 dated 20.03.2017), have calculated the income tax by deducting the amount exempted under Section 80C of the Income Tax Act and also given statutory exemption for the first Rs.1,80,000/-. As already pointed out, as per Ex.P.12, the gross income of the deceased Venkata Subramanian is shown as Rs.4,01,749/- and the monthly income would come to Rs.33,479/- (Rs.4,01,749 / 12).
Madras High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1