Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.31 seconds)
Documents citing The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. vs Smt. Poonam Devi & Others on 9 May, 2014

The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Jagdish Chandra Srivastava And Others on 24 October, 2019

12.Section 76 of the Evidence Act gives the right to obtain a certified copy of a public document which any person has a right to inspect on payment of fee. A certified copy of the entries made in the public record is required to be issued on payment of fee in Form-54 as laid down by Rule 150(2). Form-54 being a certified copy of a public document, namely, the State Register of Driving Licence, need not be proved by examining a witness. Once a certified copy of the entries made in the register maintained under section 26(1) read with Rule 23 is issued in Form-54 it is admissible in evidence under section 77 of the Evidence Act, and no further proof of Form-54 by oral evidence by examining witnesses is required.
Allahabad High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - R Kumar - Full Document

Ram Shabad Yadav vs Harilal on 3 March, 2023

"16. ....The insurance company on its part investigated the validity of the driving licence(DL No. 2222/RJ/2005) and consequently filed the report received from the concerned R.T.O. under Form 54 before the tribunal. The bare perusal of the report received on Form 54 would go on to show that the driving licence no. 2222/RJ/2005 was issued in favour of one Krishna Goapal and not in the name of the alleged offending driver i.e, Bhola. As such the photocopy of the driving licence of Bhola filed by owner of the truck/appellant was a fake document. It is a settled proposition of law that Form 54 is a public document which does not requires further evidence of formal proof by examining a witness. It is further submitted that this Court in paragraph no.12 of Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Poonam Kesarwani and others, reported in 2009() ADJ,1 has held accordingly:-
Allahabad High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - A Bhanot - Full Document

National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Matadin Ahirwar And 6 Ors. on 29 January, 2020

It is held that Form 54 being the certified copy of a public document need not be proved by examining a witness but in the present case as was the case in the matter of Poonam Kesharwani (supra), appellants have not bothered to produce copy of any document in Form-54 to show that such Form was obtained and produced at any stage. Even at the appellate stage, Insurance Company had not taken pains to produce such Form-54 along with an appropriate application.
Allahabad High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - V Agarwal - Full Document
1